» Articles » PMID: 25558315

C1-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Fixation and Fusion for C2 Pathologies and Hangman's Fractures

Overview
Journal Asian Spine J
Date 2015 Jan 6
PMID 25558315
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective clinical study.

Purpose: We report our experience of eight patients treated with C1-C3 lateral mass rod-screw stabilization and fusion in the treatment of Hangman's fracture and other axis pathologies.

Overview Of Literature: Different surgical approaches, both anterior and posterior, have been described for treating Hangman's fracture and other pathologies where surgery is indicated.

Methods: All patients who underwent surgical treatment for Hangman's fracture and axial pathology where C1-C3 lateral mass screw-rod stabilization and fusion done, following reduction of the fracture or removal of the pathology were included in this series. The recorded patient management data was retrospectively studied.

Results: There were 8 cases in total. All were male, with an average age of 40.75 years. Hangman's fracture occurred in 6 cases (75%), one with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma and the remaining with plasmocytoma. Among the Hangman's fractures 4 (66.66%) had no neuro-deficit. Reduction and bilateral C1-C3 lateral mass screw and rod fixation with posterior fusion by bone graft was performed in all cases. In 2 cases, a C2 body tumor was removed transorally. All patients with neuro-deficit fully recovered, except one who expired in the early post-operative period. Rest of all patients were leading a normal life till last follow up.

Conclusions: Although the number of cases was very small with a relatively short follow up period, C1 and C3 lateral mass screw-rod fixation followed by fusion showed promise as an effective and biomechanically sound way for the treatment of properly selected Hangman's fracture cases, and may also be suitable in other axial pathologies.

Citing Articles

Surgical Management of Hangman's Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Mahmoud A, Shanmuganathan K, Montgomery A Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(3):454-467.

PMID: 36963808 PMC: 10312205. DOI: 10.14444/8445.


Atlantoaxial instability and cervical noninfectious spondylodiscitis in a patient with Wegener's granulomatosis: A case report.

Rezvani M, Sabouri M, Aminmansour B, Tabesh H, Shafiei M, Mahmoodkhani M Clin Case Rep. 2022; 10(4):e05675.

PMID: 35387290 PMC: 8978785. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5675.


Management of Neglected Upper Cervical Spine Injuries.

Ifthekar S, Ahuja K, Mittal S, Sarkar B, Deep G, Thomas W Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55(3):673-679.

PMID: 33995872 PMC: 8081783. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00227-y.


Transpedicular direct osteosynthesis of hangman's fracture from a mini-open exposure as a less invasive procedure: A technical note.

Kovari V, Josvai A, Csokay A Trauma Case Rep. 2018; 12:66-71.

PMID: 29644289 PMC: 5887098. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2017.10.025.


Lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine injury.

Rehman L, Bukhari I, Afzal A, Rizvi R Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 33(6):1355-1359.

PMID: 29492058 PMC: 5768824. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.336.12947.


References
1.
Duggal N, Chamberlain R, Perez-Garza L, Espinoza-Larios A, Sonntag V, Crawford N . Hangman's fracture: a biomechanical comparison of stabilization techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(2):182-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251917.83529.0b. View

2.
Elmiligui Y, Koptan W, Emran I . Transpedicular screw fixation for type II Hangman's fracture: a motion preserving procedure. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(8):1299-305. PMC: 2989200. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1401-2. View

3.
Dalbayrak S, Yilmaz M, Firidin M, Naderi S . Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis treated with direct C2 pars screw. Turk Neurosurg. 2009; 19(2):163-7. View

4.
Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Dussault R, Laurin C . Fractures of the ring of the axis. A classification based on the analysis of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981; 63-B(3):319-27. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.63B3.7263741. View

5.
Guiot B, Fessler R . Complex atlantoaxial fractures. J Neurosurg. 1999; 91(2 Suppl):139-43. DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.91.2.0139. View