» Articles » PMID: 25556985

Single-sweep Spectral Analysis of Contact Heat Evoked Potentials: a Novel Approach to Identify Altered Cortical Processing After Morphine Treatment

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2015 Jan 6
PMID 25556985
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The cortical response to nociceptive thermal stimuli recorded as contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) may be altered by morphine. However, previous studies have averaged CHEPs over multiple stimuli, which are confounded by jitter between sweeps. Thus, the aim was to assess single-sweep characteristics to identify alterations induced by morphine.

Methods: In a crossover study 15 single-sweep CHEPs were analyzed from 62 electroencephalography electrodes in 26 healthy volunteers before and after administration of morphine or placebo. Each sweep was decomposed by a continuous wavelet transform to obtain normalized spectral indices in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-32 Hz) and gamma (32-80 Hz) bands. The average distribution over all sweeps and channels was calculated for the four recordings for each volunteer, and the two recordings before treatments were assessed for reproducibility. Baseline corrected spectral indices after morphine and placebo treatments were compared to identify alterations induced by morphine.

Results: Reproducibility between baseline CHEPs was demonstrated. As compared with placebo, morphine decreased the spectral indices in the delta and theta bands by 13% (P = 0.04) and 9% (P = 0.007), while the beta and gamma bands were increased by 10% (P = 0.006) and 24% (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: The decreases in the delta and theta band are suggested to represent a decrease in the pain specific morphology of the CHEPs, which indicates a diminished pain response after morphine administration. Hence, assessment of spectral indices in single-sweep CHEPs can be used to study cortical mechanisms induced by morphine treatment.

Citing Articles

Divergent effects of conditioned pain modulation on subjective pain and nociceptive-related brain activity.

Albu S, Meagher M Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(7):1735-1744.

PMID: 31030281 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05545-8.


Characterization of cortical source generators based on electroencephalography during tonic pain.

Hansen T, Mark E, Olesen S, Gram M, Frokjaer J, Drewes A J Pain Res. 2017; 10:1401-1409.

PMID: 28652806 PMC: 5476635. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S132909.

References
1.
Atkinson G, Nevill A . Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998; 26(4):217-38. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002. View

2.
Staahl C, Christrup L, Andersen S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Drewes A . A comparative study of oxycodone and morphine in a multi-modal, tissue-differentiated experimental pain model. Pain. 2006; 123(1-2):28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.006. View

3.
Warbrick T, Derbyshire S, Bagshaw A . Optimizing the measurement of contact heat evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 26(2):117-22. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31819d8016. View

4.
Quante M, Scharein E, Zimmermann R, Langer-Brauburger B, Bromm B . Dissociation of morphine analgesia and sedation evaluated by EEG measures in healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung. 2004; 54(3):143-51. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296951. View

5.
Iannetti G, Zambreanu L, Tracey I . Similar nociceptive afferents mediate psychophysical and electrophysiological responses to heat stimulation of glabrous and hairy skin in humans. J Physiol. 2006; 577(Pt 1):235-48. PMC: 2000695. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.115675. View