» Articles » PMID: 25552897

Evaluation of the IPad As a Low Vision Aid for Improving Reading Ability

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Jan 2
PMID 25552897
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the iPad as a low vision aid in improving the reading ability of low vision patients (LVPs).

Methods: In this study, 228 consecutive patients that came for their routine eye care examination at the University of Florida, Jacksonville eye clinic, were enrolled. Patients met inclusion criteria if they had best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/100 or worse in the best corrected eye and were willing to participate in the study. The patient's reading ability was assessed both with the patient's own spectacles and an iPad. Patients were encouraged to enlarge the reading material as well as change the contrast until they could read comfortably. The number of patients able to read the text comfortably was recorded.

Results: Out of the total 228 participants who qualified, 103 (45%) were male and 125 (55%) were female. Only 22% could read standard newsprint-sized text (N8) without the help of an iPad. With the help of an iPad, 94% participants with impaired vision were able to read standard newsprint-sized text (N8) or smaller text (P<0.01).

Conclusion: The iPad, a new portable electronic media device, can be adapted by LVPs to improve their reading ability.

Citing Articles

Online Survey of Digital Reading by Adults with Low Vision.

Wu Y, Granquist C, Gage R, Crossland M, Legge G Optom Vis Sci. 2020; 97(4):249-256.

PMID: 32304534 PMC: 7172011. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001503.


Tuneable Liquid Crystal Micro-Lens Array for Image Contrast Enhancement in a Pixelated Thin Film Photo-Transistor Flat Panel Imager.

Li K, Chu D, Chu J, Kitajima S, Matsuda T, Kimura M Micromachines (Basel). 2018; 8(7).

PMID: 30400396 PMC: 6190467. DOI: 10.3390/mi8070205.


Effectiveness of the Apple iPad as a Spot-reading Magnifier.

Wittich W, Jarry J, Morrice E, Johnson A Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95(9):704-710.

PMID: 30153239 PMC: 6133231. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001269.


[Electronic vision aids : New options for rehabilitation of the visually impaired].

Celik N, Rohrschneider K Ophthalmologe. 2018; 115(7):553-558.

PMID: 29322255 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0644-2.


[Evaluation of the medical treatment situation of the visually impaired : Significant differences between young and old].

Oeverhaus M, Hirche H, Esser J, Eckstein A, Schaperdoth-Gerlings B Ophthalmologe. 2018; 116(2):164-171.

PMID: 29318381 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0643-3.


References
1.
Scott I, Smiddy W, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Pappas C . Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low-vision services. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 128(1):54-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00108-7. View

2.
Burggraaff M, van Nispen R, Hoeben F, Knol D, van Rens G . Randomized controlled trial on the effects of training in the use of closed-circuit television on reading performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(4):2142-50. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8407. View

3.
Gill K, Mao A, Powell A, Sheidow T . Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27(5):639-43. PMC: 3650266. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.14. View

4.
Margrain T . Helping blind and partially sighted people to read: the effectiveness of low vision aids. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84(8):919-21. PMC: 1723574. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.84.8.919. View

5.
Wolffsohn J, Peterson R . A review of current knowledge on Electronic Vision Enhancement Systems for the visually impaired. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003; 23(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00087.x. View