» Articles » PMID: 25539084

Tel1(ATM)-mediated Interference Suppresses Clustered Meiotic Double-strand-break Formation

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Dec 25
PMID 25539084
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Meiotic recombination is a critical step in gametogenesis for many organisms, enabling the creation of genetically diverse haploid gametes. In each meiotic cell, recombination is initiated by numerous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) created by Spo11, the evolutionarily conserved topoisomerase-like protein, but how these DSBs are distributed relatively uniformly across the four chromatids that make up each chromosome pair is poorly understood. Here we employ Saccharomyces cerevisiae to demonstrate distance-dependent DSB interference in cis (in which the occurrence of a DSB suppresses adjacent DSB formation)--a process that is mediated by the conserved DNA damage response kinase, Tel1(ATM). The inhibitory function of Tel1 acts on a relatively local scale, while over large distances DSBs have a tendency to form independently of one another even in the presence of Tel1. Notably, over very short distances, loss of Tel1 activity causes DSBs to cluster within discrete zones of concerted DSB activity. Our observations support a hierarchical view of recombination initiation where Tel1(ATM) prevents clusters of DSBs, and further suppresses DSBs within the surrounding chromosomal region. Such collective negative regulation will help to ensure that recombination events are dispersed evenly and arranged optimally for genetic exchange and efficient chromosome segregation.

Citing Articles

Kinetic analysis of strand invasion during meiosis reveals similar rates of sister- and homolog-directed repair.

Hamrick A, Cope H, Forbis D, Rog O bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829846 PMC: 11741252. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.10.632442.


Profiling Tel1 signaling reveals a non-canonical motif targeting DNA repair and telomere control machineries.

Comstock W, Comstock W, Bhattarai S, Sanford E, Sanford E, Navarro M J Biol Chem. 2025; 301(3):108194.

PMID: 39826692 PMC: 11875207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108194.


Decoding the Nucleolar Role in Meiotic Recombination and Cell Cycle Control: Insights into Cdc14 Function.

Alonso-Ramos P, Carballo J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684572 PMC: 11641746. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312861.


Separable roles of the DNA damage response kinase Mec1ATR and its activator Rad24RAD17 during meiotic recombination.

Crawford M, Harper J, Cooper T, Marsolier-Kergoat M, Llorente B, Neale M PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(12):e1011485.

PMID: 39652586 PMC: 11658708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011485.


Osmotic disruption of chromatin induces Topoisomerase 2 activity at sites of transcriptional stress.

Gittens W, Allison R, Wright E, Brown G, Neale M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10606.

PMID: 39639049 PMC: 11621772. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54567-6.


References
1.
Steinel N, Lee B, Tubbs A, Bednarski J, Schulte E, Yang-Iott K . The ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase controls Igκ allelic exclusion by inhibiting secondary Vκ-to-Jκ rearrangements. J Exp Med. 2013; 210(2):233-9. PMC: 3570110. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20121605. View

2.
Gray S, Allison R, Garcia V, Goldman A, Neale M . Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR). Open Biol. 2013; 3(7):130019. PMC: 3728922. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.130019. View

3.
Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau H, Tischfield S . A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell. 2011; 144(5):719-31. PMC: 3063416. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009. View

4.
Cao L, Alani E, Kleckner N . A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1990; 61(6):1089-101. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90072-m. View

5.
Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij D, Burgoyne P . Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25(16):7203-15. PMC: 1190256. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7203-7215.2005. View