» Articles » PMID: 25535265

A School Health Center Intervention for Abusive Adolescent Relationships: a Cluster RCT

Overview
Journal Pediatrics
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2014 Dec 24
PMID 25535265
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Few evidence-based interventions address adolescent relationship abuse in clinical settings. This cluster randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of a brief relationship abuse education and counseling intervention in school health centers (SHCs).

Methods: In 2012-2013, 11 SHCs (10 clusters) were randomized to intervention (SHC providers received training to implement) or standard-of-care control condition. Among 1062 eligible students ages 14 to 19 years at 8 SHCs who continued participation after randomization, 1011 completed computer-assisted surveys before a clinic visit; 939 completed surveys 3 months later (93% retention).

Results: Intervention versus control adjusted mean differences (95% confidence interval) on changes in primary outcomes were not statistically significant: recognition of abuse = 0.10 (-0.02 to 0.22); intentions to intervene = 0.03 (-0.09 to 0.15); and knowledge of resources = 0.18 (-0.06 to 0.42). Intervention participants had improved recognition of sexual coercion compared with controls (adjusted mean difference = 0.10 [0.01 to 0.18]). In exploratory analyses adjusting for intensity of intervention uptake, intervention effects were significant for increased knowledge of relationship abuse resources and self-efficacy to use harm reduction behaviors. Among participants reporting relationship abuse at baseline, intervention participants were less likely to report such abuse at follow-up (mean risk difference = -0.17 [-0.21 to -0.12]). Adolescents in intervention clinics who reported ever being in an unhealthy relationship were more likely to report disclosing this during the SHC visit (adjusted odds ratio = 2.77 [1.29 to 5.95]).

Conclusions: This is the first evidence of the potential benefit of a SHC intervention to address abusive relationships among adolescents.

Citing Articles

Pediatricians' Practices and Desired Resources for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence.

Scott S, Ragavan M, Mickievicz E, Handrinos A, Amodei J, Chang J Partner Abuse. 2024; 15(4):550-570.

PMID: 39568864 PMC: 11578101. DOI: 10.1891/pa-2023-0044.


Sex Workers' Experiences of Screening for Intimate Partner Violence.

Zemlak J, Alexander K, Wilson D, Singer R, Williams J, Sherman S J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2024; 53(4):397-405.

PMID: 38490264 PMC: 11246806. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.02.005.


Gender and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexual Violence Knowledge, Prevention Behaviors, and Care-Seeking Behaviors.

Coulter R, Szoko N, Frankeberger J, Adams B, Jones K, Chugani C Prev Sci. 2024; 25(4):590-602.

PMID: 38214789 PMC: 11111351. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01640-z.


A case series measuring campus and clinic level factors during implementation of a sexual violence prevention intervention in campus health and counseling centers: does environment matter?.

Anderson J, Peruggia G, Miller-Walfish S, Talis J, Burrell C, Hayes M Implement Sci Commun. 2023; 4(1):88.

PMID: 37525258 PMC: 10388455. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00467-7.


Are school-based interventions to prevent dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence equally effective for all students? Systematic review and equity analysis of moderation analyses in randomised trials.

Melendez-Torres G, Bonell C, Shaw N, Orr N, Chollet A, Rizzo A Prev Med Rep. 2023; 34:102277.

PMID: 37387728 PMC: 10302154. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102277.