Risk of Revision Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Metal-on-conventional Polyethylene Compared with Metal-on-highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Bearing Surfaces: International Results from Six Registries
Overview
Orthopedics
Authors
Affiliations
The results of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have suggested reduced radiographic wear in highly cross-linked polyethylene compared with conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. However, longer-term clinical results have not been thoroughly examined, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of revision for metal-on-conventional and metal-on-highly cross-linked total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces with use of a distributed data network of six national and regional registries (Kaiser Permanente, HealthEast, the Emilia-Romagna region in Italy, the Catalan region in Spain, Norway, and Australia). Inclusion criteria were osteoarthritis as the primary diagnosis, cementless implant fixation, and a patient age of forty-five to sixty-four years. These criteria resulted in a sample of 16,571 primary total hip arthroplasties. Multivariate meta-analysis was performed with use of linear mixed models, with survival probability as the unit of analysis. The results of a fixed-effects model suggested that there was insufficient evidence of a difference in risk of revision between bearing surfaces (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.79]; p = 0.384). Highly cross-linked polyethylene does not appear to have a reduced risk of revision in this subgroup of total hip arthroplasty patients. Arthroplasties involving highly cross-linked polyethylene do not appear to have an increased risk of revision in this subgroup of total hip arthroplasty patients.
Decker M, Price A, Khalili A, Klassen R, Walzak M, Teeter M Orthop Res Rev. 2021; 13:113-122.
PMID: 34429667 PMC: 8380133. DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S309210.
Global diversity in bearings in primary THA.
Tsikandylakis G, Overgaard S, Zagra L, Karrholm J EFORT Open Rev. 2020; 5(10):763-775.
PMID: 33204520 PMC: 7608521. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.
Zhang C, Chen M, Yu W, Han X, Ye J, Zhuang J J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(9):300060520941974.
PMID: 32924700 PMC: 7493252. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520941974.
Medical device surveillance with electronic health records.
Callahan A, Fries J, Re C, Huddleston 3rd J, Giori N, Delp S NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:94.
PMID: 31583282 PMC: 6761113. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0168-z.
Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration.
Paxton E, Mohaddes M, Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Graves S, Malchau H Acta Orthop. 2018; 89(4):369-373.
PMID: 29589467 PMC: 6600132. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1454383.