» Articles » PMID: 25519810

Bimatoprost 0.01% in Treatment-naïve Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: an Observational Study in the Korean Clinical Setting

Overview
Journal BMC Ophthalmol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Dec 19
PMID 25519810
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability (ie, occurrence and severity of hyperemia) of bimatoprost 0.01% in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension in the Korean clinical setting.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, observational study, treatment-naïve patients with OAG, including patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG, defined as IOP ≤21 mm Hg), or ocular hypertension received bimatoprost 0.01% once daily. Hyperemia was assessed at baseline and weeks 6 and 12, graded by a masked evaluator using a photonumeric scale (0, +0.5, +1, +2, +3), and grouped as (0 to +1) and (+2 to +3). Shifts between groupings were reported as no change, improved ([+2 to +3] to [0 to +1]), or worsened ([0 to +1] to [+2 to +3]). Other adverse events were monitored. Mean IOP changes from baseline at weeks 6 and 12 were reported. Supplemental analyses were conducted for IOPs >21 versus ≤21 mm Hg.

Results: Of 295 treatment-naïve patients included in the intent-to-treat/safety population, 73 (24.7%) had baseline IOP >21 mm Hg (mean, 25.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg) and 222 (75.3%) had baseline IOP ≤21 mm Hg (mean, 16.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg); 96.3% had hyperemia graded none (36.3%) to mild (17.3%). At week 12, hyperemia was graded none to mild in 83.7% (n = 220). Worsening occurred in 12.3% of patients by week 6 and 12.7% by week 12. Small improvements occurred in 0.8% and 0.5% of patients at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. Hyperemia scores were generally low and the majority of patients had no change in severity during the study. Mean IOP at weeks 6 and 12 was reduced to 16.4 ± 4.0 mm Hg (-34.5%; P < 0.0001) and 16.7 ± 3.9 mm Hg (-32.0%; P < 0.001) in the baseline-IOP >21 mm Hg group versus 13.3 ± 2.6 mm Hg (-17.8%; P < 0.001) and 13.7 ± 2.8 mm Hg (-15.9%; P < 0.001) in the baseline-IOP ≤21 mm Hg group, respectively.

Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients, bimatoprost 0.01% induced low shifts in worsening of hyperemia and significant reductions in IOP, regardless of baseline IOP.

Trial Registration:

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01594970.

Citing Articles

From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.

Zeppieri M, Gagliano C, Spadea L, Salati C, Chukwuyem E, Enaholo E Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(5).

PMID: 38794131 PMC: 11124470. DOI: 10.3390/ph17050561.


Evaluating intraocular pressure-lowering solutions for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: comparison between bimatoprost 0.03% and bimatoprost 0.01% - an observational switch study.

Deshpande S, Sonty S, Ahmad A Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11:1371-1376.

PMID: 28794615 PMC: 5538690. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S137537.


Tolerability and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.01 % in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension evaluated in the Taiwanese clinical setting: the Asia Pacific Patterns from Early Access of Lumigan 0.01 % (APPEAL Taiwan) study.

Chen Y, Wang T, Liu C, Wu K, Chiu S, Simonyi S BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 16(1):162.

PMID: 27633513 PMC: 5025541. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0338-6.


Comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination and 0.5% timolol in normal-tension glaucoma patients.

Kim J, Kim T, Kim C, Kim H, Park K Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015; 60(1):20-6.

PMID: 26578422 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-015-0420-2.


Bimatoprost 0.01 % for previously treated patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in the Korean clinical setting.

Kook M, Simonyi S, Sohn Y, Kim C, Park K Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015; 59(5):325-34.

PMID: 26202440 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-015-0392-2.

References
1.
Cohen J, Gross R, Cheetham J, Vandenburgh A, Bernstein P, Whitcup S . Two-year double-masked comparison of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49 Suppl 1:S45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.12.019. View

2.
. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 126(4):487-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00223-2. View

3.
. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 126(4):498-505. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00272-4. View

4.
Kim J, Kang S, Kim N, Lee E, Hong S, Seong G . Prevalence and characteristics of glaucoma among Korean adults. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011; 25(2):110-5. PMC: 3060387. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.2.110. View

5.
Williams R, Cohen J, Gross R, Liu C, Safyan E, Batoosingh A . Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92(10):1387-92. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.128454. View