» Articles » PMID: 25510358

Salvage Cryosurgery for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Primary Cryotherapy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2014 Dec 17
PMID 25510358
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To report our preliminary experience of salvage cryosurgery (SCS) for locally recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after primary cryotherapy and determine the efficacy of cryoablation of the prostate in the salvage setting.

Patients And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all patients who underwent SCS for locally recurrent PCa after primary cryotherapy between February 2008 and March 2012. Patients were assessed after treatment by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, transrectal ultrasonography, radiologic imaging, and biopsy. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria.

Results: Data from 12 patients who had undergone SCS were entered. Median age at SCS was 77.5 year. Before SCS, patients had a median PSA level of 2.5 ng/ml and median Gleason sum of 7. Patients underwent SCS at a median of 7.8 months after primary CS. Median PSA nadir after SCS was 1.32 ng/ml. The mean (range) follow-up was 33.5 months. Three patients were started on hormonal therapy for disease progression at a median post-SCS period of 12 months. Two patients underwent repeat cryoablation. Only one patient developed mild incontinence after SCS. Urethral sloughing occurred in one patient. Only two patients suffered from transient impotence.

Conclusions: It is feasible for patients with PCa to adopt SCS when primary cryotherapy has failed. The application of SCS also allows hormonal therapy to be deferred for a sufficient period of time.

Citing Articles

The Role of Whole-Gland and Focal Cryotherapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Pio F, Murdock A, Fuller R, Whalen M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39335196 PMC: 11430134. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183225.


Salvage treatments after focal therapy for prostate cancer - a comprehensive review.

Ramacciotti L, Abreu A, Crouzet S, Macek P, Miles B, Horuz R Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 39090369 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00875-3.


Analysis of Several Pathways for Efficient Killing of Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: A Central Role of NF-κB RELA.

Witte K, Pfitzenmaier J, Storm J, Lutkemeyer M, Wimmer C, Schulten W Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(16).

PMID: 34445612 PMC: 8396252. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168901.


Complications, oncological and functional outcomes of salvage treatment options following focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and a comprehensive narrative review.

Marra G, Gontero P, Walz J, Sivaraman A, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Cathelineau X World J Urol. 2019; 37(8):1517-1534.

PMID: 30710157 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02642-9.


Cryosurgery would be An Effective Option for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Gao L, Yang L, Qian S, Tang Z, Qin F, Wei Q Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27490.

PMID: 27271239 PMC: 4895342. DOI: 10.1038/srep27490.


References
1.
Pisters L, Von Eschenbach A, Scott S, Swanson D, Dinney C, Pettaway C . The efficacy and complications of salvage cryotherapy of the prostate. J Urol. 1997; 157(3):921-5. View

2.
Bahn D, Lee F, Silverman P, Bahn E, Badalament R, Kumar A . Salvage cryosurgery for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: a seven-year follow-up. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2004; 2(2):111-4. DOI: 10.3816/cgc.2003.n.018. View

3.
Ward J, Stephen Jones J . Focal cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a report from the national Cryo On-Line Database (COLD) Registry. BJU Int. 2011; 109(11):1648-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10578.x. View

4.
Bahn D, De Castro Abreu A, Gill I, Hung A, Silverman P, Gross M . Focal cryotherapy for clinically unilateral, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in 73 men with a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.006. View

5.
Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M . Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52(1):23-47. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.52.1.23. View