» Articles » PMID: 25505503

Stochastic Simulation in Systems Biology

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2014 Dec 16
PMID 25505503
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural systems are, almost by definition, heterogeneous: this can be either a boon or an obstacle to be overcome, depending on the situation. Traditionally, when constructing mathematical models of these systems, heterogeneity has typically been ignored, despite its critical role. However, in recent years, stochastic computational methods have become commonplace in science. They are able to appropriately account for heterogeneity; indeed, they are based around the premise that systems inherently contain at least one source of heterogeneity (namely, intrinsic heterogeneity). In this mini-review, we give a brief introduction to theoretical modelling and simulation in systems biology and discuss the three different sources of heterogeneity in natural systems. Our main topic is an overview of stochastic simulation methods in systems biology. There are many different types of stochastic methods. We focus on one group that has become especially popular in systems biology, biochemistry, chemistry and physics. These discrete-state stochastic methods do not follow individuals over time; rather they track only total populations. They also assume that the volume of interest is spatially homogeneous. We give an overview of these methods, with a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each, and suggest when each is more appropriate to use. We also include references to software implementations of them, so that beginners can quickly start using stochastic methods for practical problems of interest.

Citing Articles

Loss formulations for assumption-free neural inference of SDE coefficient functions.

Vaisband M, von Bornhaupt V, Schmid N, Abulizi I, Hasenauer J NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2025; 11(1):22.

PMID: 40025020 PMC: 11873317. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-025-00500-6.


Application of a novel numerical simulation to biochemical reaction systems.

Sato T Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1351974.

PMID: 39310225 PMC: 11412882. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1351974.


Holimap: an accurate and efficient method for solving stochastic gene network dynamics.

Jia C, Grima R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):6557.

PMID: 39095346 PMC: 11297302. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50716-z.


Fluorescent biosensor imaging meets deterministic mathematical modelling: quantitative investigation of signalling compartmentalization.

Posner C, Mehta S, Zhang J J Physiol. 2023; 601(19):4227-4241.

PMID: 37747358 PMC: 10764149. DOI: 10.1113/JP282696.


Limits and Prospects of Molecular Fingerprinting for Phenotyping Biological Systems Revealed through Modeling.

Eissa T, Kepesidis K, Zigman M, Huber M Anal Chem. 2023; 95(16):6523-6532.

PMID: 37043294 PMC: 10134135. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04711.


References
1.
Stamatakis M, Adams R, Balazsi G . A common repressor pool results in indeterminacy of extrinsic noise. Chaos. 2012; 21(4):047523. PMC: 3258287. DOI: 10.1063/1.3658618. View

2.
Balaban N, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S . Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science. 2004; 305(5690):1622-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1099390. View

3.
Gillespie C . Stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems using multi-core processors. J Chem Phys. 2012; 136(1):014101. DOI: 10.1063/1.3670416. View

4.
Chatterjee A, Vlachos D, Katsoulakis M . Binomial distribution based tau-leap accelerated stochastic simulation. J Chem Phys. 2005; 122(2):024112. DOI: 10.1063/1.1833357. View

5.
Sanft K, Wu S, Roh M, Fu J, Lim R, Petzold L . StochKit2: software for discrete stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with events. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(17):2457-8. PMC: 3157925. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr401. View