» Articles » PMID: 25504039

Parental Decision Making in Male Circumcision

Overview
Specialty Nursing
Date 2014 Dec 16
PMID 25504039
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study which healthcare professionals (HCPs) firstasked parents about their decision regarding circumcision; whether parents felt they were given enough information by their HCP; and what reasons parents cited for their decision.

Study Design And Methods: Bilingual questionnaires were administered to parents and expecting parents of boys (N = 60). Close-ended survey responses were analyzed through factor analysis to ascertain what types of beliefs parents used in their decision making, whether they felt they had enough information, and who first asked them about their decision.

Results: Nurses were most likely to be the first HCPs to ask parents about circumcision. Parental personal and cultural beliefs played an equal or more important role in influencing decision making than medical information received. However, some parents noted that there was a lack of access to accurate information regarding risks and benefits of male circumcision.

Clinical Nursing Implications: Nurses continue to play a critical role in acquisition of knowledge surrounding male circumcision and serve as important liaisons between parents and the proxy consent process. Nurses, as well as other HCPs, should discuss circumcision early in pregnancy so parents have ample time to ask questions, gather information, and make an appropriate decision.

Citing Articles

Physician Perspectives on Performing Newborn Circumcisions: Barriers and Opportunities.

Johnson E, Rosoklija I, Walton R, Matoka D, Seager C, Holl J Matern Child Health J. 2023; 28(1):144-154.

PMID: 37919635 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03822-1.


Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision.

Tye M, Sardi L Int J Impot Res. 2022; 35(3):242-248.

PMID: 35347302 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9.


Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.

Morgan A, Hu Y, Benin A, Lockwood G Matern Child Health J. 2021; 25(12):1972-1980.

PMID: 34709527 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03228-x.


"To speak or not to speak": A qualitative analysis on the attitude and willingness of women to start conversations about voluntary medical male circumcision with their partners in a peri-urban area, South Africa.

Chetty-Makkan C, Grund J, Munyai R, Gadla V, Chihota V, Maraisane M PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210480.

PMID: 30682057 PMC: 6347244. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210480.

References
1.
Adler R, Ottaway M, Gould S . Circumcision: we have heard from the experts; now let's hear from the parents. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(2):E20. DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.2.e20. View

2.
Kaufman M, Clark J, Castro C . Neonatal circumcision. Benefits, risks, and Family teaching. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001; 26(4):197-201. DOI: 10.1097/00005721-200107000-00009. View

3.
Binner S, Mastrobattista J, Day M, Swaim L, Monga M . Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision. South Med J. 2002; 95(4):457-61. View

4.
Lee S, Park E, Choe B . Parental concerns on the circumcision for elementary school boys: a questionnaire study. J Korean Med Sci. 2003; 18(1):73-9. PMC: 3054978. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.1.73. View

5.
Noah B . The participation of underrepresented minorities in clinical research. Am J Law Med. 2003; 29(2-3):221-45. View