Partial Weight Support Differentially Affects Corticomotor Excitability Across Muscles of the Upper Limb

Overview

Journal Physiol Rep

Specialty Physiology

Date 2014 Dec 16

PMID 25501435

Citations 9

Authors

Keith D Runnalls

Greg Anson

Steven L Wolf

Winston D Byblow

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Partial weight support may hold promise as a therapeutic adjuvant during rehabilitation after stroke by providing a permissive environment for reducing the expression of abnormal muscle synergies that cause upper limb impairment. We explored the neurophysiological effects of upper limb weight support in 13 healthy young adults by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of primary motor cortex and electromyography from anterior deltoid (AD), biceps brachii (BB), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), and first dorsal interosseous (FDI). Five levels of weight support, varying from none to full, were provided to the arm using a commercial device (Saebo Mobile Arm Support). For each level of support, stimulus-response (SR) curves were derived from MEPs across a range of TMS intensities. Weight support affected background EMG activity in each of the four muscles examined (P < 0.0001 for each muscle). Tonic background activity was primarily reduced in the AD. Weight support had a differential effect on the size of MEPs across muscles. After curve fitting, the SR plateau for ECR increased at the lowest support level (P = 0.004). For FDI, the SR plateau increased at the highest support level (P = 0.0003). These results indicate that weight support of the proximal upper limb modulates corticomotor excitability across the forearm and hand. The findings support a model of integrated control of the upper limb and may inform the use of weight support in clinical settings.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of different torque profiles for weight compensation of the hand.

van der Burgh B, Filius S, Radaelli G, Harlaar J Wearable Technol. 2024; 5:e2.

PMID: 38510986 PMC: 10952050. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2023.23.

Shoulder position and handedness differentially affect excitability and intracortical inhibition of hand muscles.

Geed S, Grainger M, Harris-Love M, Lum P, Dromerick A Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(5):1517-1530.

PMID: 33751158 PMC: 8317198. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06077-w.

Human arm weight compensation in rehabilitation robotics: efficacy of three distinct methods.

Just F, Ozen O, Tortora S, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R, Rauter G J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):13.

PMID: 32024528 PMC: 7003349. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-0644-3.

Effects of arm weight support on neuromuscular activation during reaching in chronic stroke patients.

Runnalls K, Ortega-Auriol P, McMorland A, Anson G, Byblow W Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(12):3391-3408.

PMID: 31728596 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05687-9.

In Standing, Corticospinal Excitability Is Proportional to COP Velocity Whereas M1 Excitability Is Participant-Specific.

Nandi T, Lamoth C, van Keeken H, Bakker L, Kok I, Salem G Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:303.

PMID: 30104968 PMC: 6077221. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00303.

References

Garnett R, Stephens J . Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol. 1981; 311:463-73. PMC: 1275423. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013598. View

Wolf S, Binder-Macleod S . Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983; 63(9):1393-403. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/63.9.1393. View

Lee W . Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. J Mot Behav. 1984; 16(2):135-70. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1984.10735316. View

Schneider C, Zytnicki D, Capaday C . Quantitative evidence for multiple widespread representations of individual muscles in the cat motor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 310(2-3):183-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02105-x. View

Park M, Belhaj-Saif A, Gordon M, Cheney P . Consistent features in the forelimb representation of primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(8):2784-92. PMC: 6762507. View

Lacquaniti F, Soechting J . Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task. J Neurosci. 1982; 2(4):399-408. PMC: 6564249. View

Prange G, Jannink M, Stienen A, Van Der Kooij H, IJzerman M, Hermens H . Influence of gravity compensation on muscle activation patterns during different temporal phases of arm movements of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(5):478-85. DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328720. View

Ginanneschi F, Del Santo F, Dominici F, Gelli F, Mazzocchio R, Rossi A . Changes in corticomotor excitability of hand muscles in relation to static shoulder positions. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 161(3):374-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2084-x. View

Bizzi E, Cheung V . The neural origin of muscle synergies. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013; 7:51. PMC: 3638124. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00051. View

10.

Schneider C, Devanne H, Lavoie B, Capaday C . Neural mechanisms involved in the functional linking of motor cortical points. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 146(1):86-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1137-2. View

11.

Rossini P, Tecchio F, Sabato A, Finazzi-Agro A, Pasqualetti P, Rossi S . The role of cutaneous inputs during magnetic transcranial stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 1996; 19(10):1302-9. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199610)19:10<1302::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-I. View

12.

Bizzi E, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Giszter S . Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. Science. 1991; 253(5017):287-91. DOI: 10.1126/science.1857964. View

13.

Stinear C, Byblow W . Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(4):2014-20. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00925.2002. View

14.

Sanes J, Donoghue J, Thangaraj V, Edelman R, Warach S . Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. Science. 1995; 268(5218):1775-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.7792606. View

15.

Beck S, Hallett M . Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 121(1):98-103. PMC: 2818458. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.010. View

16.

Prange G, Jannink M, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Hermens H, IJzerman M . Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43(2):171-84. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.04.0076. View

17.

Dewald J, Beer R . Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24(2):273-83. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200102)24:2<273::aid-mus130>3.0.co;2-z. View

18.

Devanne H, Cohen L, Kouchtir-Devanne N, Capaday C . Integrated motor cortical control of task-related muscles during pointing in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 87(6):3006-17. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3006. View

19.

Rathelot J, Strick P . Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: an anatomical perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(21):8257-62. PMC: 1461407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602933103. View

20.

Pauvert V, Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Rothwell J . Role of spinal premotoneurones in mediating corticospinal input to forearm motoneurones in man. J Physiol. 1998; 508 ( Pt 1):301-12. PMC: 2230869. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.301br.x. View