Flavor Preference Conditioning by Different Sugars in Sweet Ageusic Trpm5 Knockout Mice
Overview
Psychiatry
Psychology
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Knockout (KO) mice missing the taste signaling protein Trpm5 have greatly attenuated sweetener preferences but develop strong preferences for glucose in 24-h tests, which is attributed to post-oral sugar conditioning. Trpm5 KO mice express mild preferences for galactose but no preferences for fructose in 24-h tests, which suggests that these sugars differ in their post-oral reinforcing effects. Here we investigated sugar-conditioned flavor preferences in Trpm5 KO and C57BL/6J wildtype (B6) mice. The mice were trained to consume a flavored (CS+, e.g. grape) 8% sugar solution and flavored (CS-, e.g., cherry) water on alternating days followed by two-bottle choice tests with CS+ vs. CS- flavors in water and with unflavored sugar vs. water. The KO mice displayed strong preferences (>80%) for the CS+ glucose and CS+ galactose but not for the CS+ fructose flavor. They also preferred glucose and galactose, but not fructose to water. In contrast, the B6 mice preferred all three CS+ flavors to the CS- flavor, and all three sugars to water. In tests with the non-metabolizable sugar α-methyl-d-glucopyranoside (MDG), the KO and B6 mice preferred 8% MDG to water but did not prefer the CS+ 8% MDG to CS-. However, they preferred a CS+ flavor mixed with 4% MDG over the CS- flavor. Trpm5 KO mice also preferred galactose and MDG to fructose in direct choice tests. The Trpm5 KO data indicate that glucose and, to a lesser extent, galactose and MDG have post-oral reinforcing actions that stimulate intake and preference while fructose has a much weaker effect. The CS+ flavor and sugar preferences of B6 mice may be mediated by the sweet taste and/or post-oral actions of the various sugars. Glucose, galactose, and MDG, but not fructose, are ligands for the sodium-glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1) which is implicated in post-oral sugar conditioning in B6 mice.
Gutierrez V, Martin L, Simental-Ramos A, James K, Medler K, Schier L Chem Senses. 2024; 49.
PMID: 38183495 PMC: 10825839. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjae001.
Sclafani A, Ackroff K Physiol Behav. 2022; 246:113695.
PMID: 34998826 PMC: 8826513. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113695.
Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.
Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K Physiol Behav. 2020; 222:112945.
PMID: 32417232 PMC: 7417196. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112945.
Forty-eight hour conditioning produces a robust long lasting flavor preference in rats.
Kimbrough A, Houpt T Appetite. 2019; 139:159-163.
PMID: 31047937 PMC: 7548019. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.023.
Galactose protects against cell damage in mouse models of acute pancreatitis.
Peng S, Gerasimenko J, Tsugorka T, Gryshchenko O, Samarasinghe S, Petersen O J Clin Invest. 2018; 128(9):3769-3778.
PMID: 29893744 PMC: 6118583. DOI: 10.1172/JCI94714.