» Articles » PMID: 25497884

Flavor Preference Conditioning by Different Sugars in Sweet Ageusic Trpm5 Knockout Mice

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2014 Dec 16
PMID 25497884
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knockout (KO) mice missing the taste signaling protein Trpm5 have greatly attenuated sweetener preferences but develop strong preferences for glucose in 24-h tests, which is attributed to post-oral sugar conditioning. Trpm5 KO mice express mild preferences for galactose but no preferences for fructose in 24-h tests, which suggests that these sugars differ in their post-oral reinforcing effects. Here we investigated sugar-conditioned flavor preferences in Trpm5 KO and C57BL/6J wildtype (B6) mice. The mice were trained to consume a flavored (CS+, e.g. grape) 8% sugar solution and flavored (CS-, e.g., cherry) water on alternating days followed by two-bottle choice tests with CS+ vs. CS- flavors in water and with unflavored sugar vs. water. The KO mice displayed strong preferences (>80%) for the CS+ glucose and CS+ galactose but not for the CS+ fructose flavor. They also preferred glucose and galactose, but not fructose to water. In contrast, the B6 mice preferred all three CS+ flavors to the CS- flavor, and all three sugars to water. In tests with the non-metabolizable sugar α-methyl-d-glucopyranoside (MDG), the KO and B6 mice preferred 8% MDG to water but did not prefer the CS+ 8% MDG to CS-. However, they preferred a CS+ flavor mixed with 4% MDG over the CS- flavor. Trpm5 KO mice also preferred galactose and MDG to fructose in direct choice tests. The Trpm5 KO data indicate that glucose and, to a lesser extent, galactose and MDG have post-oral reinforcing actions that stimulate intake and preference while fructose has a much weaker effect. The CS+ flavor and sugar preferences of B6 mice may be mediated by the sweet taste and/or post-oral actions of the various sugars. Glucose, galactose, and MDG, but not fructose, are ligands for the sodium-glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1) which is implicated in post-oral sugar conditioning in B6 mice.

Citing Articles

TRPM4 and PLCβ3 contribute to normal behavioral responses to an array of sweeteners and carbohydrates but PLCβ3 is not needed for taste-driven licking for glucose.

Gutierrez V, Martin L, Simental-Ramos A, James K, Medler K, Schier L Chem Senses. 2024; 49.

PMID: 38183495 PMC: 10825839. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjae001.


Fat preference deficits and experience-induced recovery in global taste-deficient Trpm5 and Calhm1 knockout mice.

Sclafani A, Ackroff K Physiol Behav. 2022; 246:113695.

PMID: 34998826 PMC: 8826513. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113695.


Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K Physiol Behav. 2020; 222:112945.

PMID: 32417232 PMC: 7417196. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112945.


Forty-eight hour conditioning produces a robust long lasting flavor preference in rats.

Kimbrough A, Houpt T Appetite. 2019; 139:159-163.

PMID: 31047937 PMC: 7548019. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.023.


Galactose protects against cell damage in mouse models of acute pancreatitis.

Peng S, Gerasimenko J, Tsugorka T, Gryshchenko O, Samarasinghe S, Petersen O J Clin Invest. 2018; 128(9):3769-3778.

PMID: 29893744 PMC: 6118583. DOI: 10.1172/JCI94714.


References
1.
Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Varadarajan V, Zou S . Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science. 2003; 301(5634):850-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1087155. View

2.
Sclafani A, Marambaud P, Ackroff K . Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice. Physiol Behav. 2014; 126:25-9. PMC: 3944641. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.12.003. View

3.
Ackroff K, Touzani K, Peets T, Sclafani A . Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency. Physiol Behav. 2001; 72(5):691-703. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00442-5. View

4.
Zhang Y, Hoon M, Chandrashekar J, Mueller K, Cook B, Wu D . Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell. 2003; 112(3):293-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0. View

5.
Sclafani A, Ackroff K . Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol Behav. 2012; 106(4):457-61. PMC: 3349008. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.008. View