» Articles » PMID: 25493425

Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Dec 11
PMID 25493425
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increasing biomedical workforce diversity remains a persistent challenge. Recent reports have shown that biomedical sciences (BMS) graduate students become less interested in faculty careers as training progresses; however, it is unclear whether or how the career preferences of women and underrepresented minority (URM) scientists change in manners distinct from their better-represented peers. We report results from a survey of 1500 recent American BMS Ph.D. graduates (including 276 URMs) that examined career preferences over the course of their graduate training experiences. On average, scientists from all social backgrounds showed significantly decreased interest in faculty careers at research universities, and significantly increased interest in non-research careers at Ph.D. completion relative to entry. However, group differences emerged in overall levels of interest (at Ph.D. entry and completion), and the magnitude of change in interest in these careers. Multiple logistic regression showed that when controlling for career pathway interest at Ph.D. entry, first-author publication rate, faculty support, research self-efficacy, and graduate training experiences, differences in career pathway interest between social identity groups persisted. All groups were less likely than men from well-represented (WR) racial/ethnic backgrounds to report high interest in faculty careers at research-intensive universities (URM men: OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36-0.98, p = 0.04; WR women: OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89, p = 0.008; URM women: OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.71, p<0.001), and URM women were more likely than all other groups to report high interest in non-research careers (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.28-2.90, p = 0.002). The persistence of disparities in the career interests of Ph.D. recipients suggests that a supply-side (or "pipeline") framing of biomedical workforce diversity challenges may limit the effectiveness of efforts to attract and retain the best and most diverse workforce. We propose incorporation of an ecological perspective of career development when considering strategies to enhance the biomedical workforce and professoriate through diversity.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 as a Mirror: Reflecting the Pandemic of Racism and the Historical Roots of Health Inequities.

Grant T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).

PMID: 40003498 PMC: 11855730. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020273.


Student-centered factors influencing inclusion in biomedical majors among first-year undergraduate students.

PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312862.

PMID: 39739733 PMC: 11687708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312862.


Benefits of promoting scholarship among program directors: promoting scholarship among directors is a win-win-win for institutions, trainees, and directors.

Brandt P, Robinson D Front Res Metr Anal. 2024; 9:1477471.

PMID: 39634194 PMC: 11615057. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2024.1477471.


Developing and Implementing a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Curriculum Self-reflection Process at a School of Public Health.

Davis S, English D, Shiau S, Bhavaraju R, Downs S, Eliasson G Public Health Rep. 2024; :333549241271728.

PMID: 39189091 PMC: 11569645. DOI: 10.1177/00333549241271728.


Establishing the short course in transferable skills training program.

Lindsey M, Harris B, Dahm L, Woods L J Cell Physiol. 2024; 239(7):e31324.

PMID: 38785335 PMC: 11843667. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.31324.


References
1.
Rockey S . Mentorship matters for the biomedical workforce. Nat Med. 2014; 20(6):575. PMC: 5152584. DOI: 10.1038/nm0614-575. View

2.
Sauermann H, Roach M . Science PhD career preferences: levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36307. PMC: 3342243. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036307. View

3.
Tabak L, Collins F . Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science. Science. 2011; 333(6045):940-1. PMC: 3440455. DOI: 10.1126/science.1211704. View

4.
Alberts B, Kirschner M, Tilghman S, Varmus H . Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(16):5773-7. PMC: 4000813. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404402111. View

5.
Mann C . Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20(1):54-60. PMC: 1726024. DOI: 10.1136/emj.20.1.54. View