Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Offers High Oncological Feasibility with Adequate Patient Safety: a Prospective Study at a Single Center
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To determine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in a single high-volume hepatobiliary center.
Background: The ALPPS approach allows achieving resectability of liver malignancies by a rapid and large future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. However, this proposal has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.
Methods: This was a single-cohort, prospective, observational study [NCT02164292]. Between June 2011 and April 2014, patients with liver malignancies considered unresectable due to an insufficient FLR who underwent ALPPS were included.
Results: Thirty patients were treated. Median age was 58.6 years (range = 35-81) and 19 patients were males (63%). In a median of 6 days (range = 4-67), the median FLR hypertrophy was 89.7% (range = 21-287). Twenty-nine patients completed the second stage (97% feasibility). Morbidity according to the Dindo-Clavien classification was 53% (grade ≥IIIa 43% and grade ≥IIIb 31%). The mortality rate was 6.6%. Total parenchymal transection was identified as an independent risk factor for complications (P = 0.049). There was not significant difference in terms of FLR hypertrophy between total or partial parenchymal transection (P = 0.45). Median hospital stay was 16 days (range = 11-62). The overall and disease-free survival at 1 year was 78% and 67% and at 2 years was 63% and 40%, respectively.
Conclusions: This prospective study on the largest reported single-center experience shows that ALPPS has acceptable morbidity and mortality, together with a high oncological feasibility and hypertrophic efficacy. Partial parenchymal transection seems to reduce morbidity without negatively impacting FLR hypertrophy.
Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Adam J, Lapuyade B, Debordeaux F, Tlili G Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):9205-9220.
PMID: 39230854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9.
DE Gasperi A, Petro L, Amici O, Scaffidi I, Molinari P, Barbaglio C World J Crit Care Med. 2024; 13(2):92751.
PMID: 38855273 PMC: 11155507. DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751.
Alvarez F, Ardiles V, Chara C, de Santibanes M, Sanchez Claria R, Pekolj J Updates Surg. 2024; 76(3):855-868.
PMID: 38647857 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01835-1.
Application of the IDEAL framework in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a review of the literature.
Wu Y, Guo J, Peng W Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 409(1):20.
PMID: 38153558 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03211-w.
Liang C, He Z, Tao Q, Tang X, Jiang L, Tu X J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).
PMID: 38137734 PMC: 10743667. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247665.