» Articles » PMID: 25488097

Prescriber Barriers and Enablers to Minimising Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Adults: a Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Dec 10
PMID 25488097
Citations 282
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To synthesise qualitative studies that explore prescribers' perceived barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) chronically prescribed in adults.

Design: A qualitative systematic review was undertaken by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL and INFORMIT from inception to March 2014, combined with an extensive manual search of reference lists and related citations. A quality checklist was used to assess the transparency of the reporting of included studies and the potential for bias. Thematic synthesis identified common subthemes and descriptive themes across studies from which an analytical construct was developed. Study characteristics were examined to explain differences in findings.

Setting: All healthcare settings.

Participants: Medical and non-medical prescribers of medicines to adults.

Outcomes: Prescribers' perspectives on factors which shape their behaviour towards continuing or discontinuing PIMs in adults.

Results: 21 studies were included; most explored primary care physicians' perspectives on managing older, community-based adults. Barriers and enablers to minimising PIMs emerged within four analytical themes: problem awareness; inertia secondary to lower perceived value proposition for ceasing versus continuing PIMs; self-efficacy in regard to personal ability to alter prescribing; and feasibility of altering prescribing in routine care environments given external constraints. The first three themes are intrinsic to the prescriber (eg, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviour) and the fourth is extrinsic (eg, patient, work setting, health system and cultural factors). The PIMs examined and practice setting influenced the themes reported.

Conclusions: A multitude of highly interdependent factors shape prescribers' behaviour towards continuing or discontinuing PIMs. A full understanding of prescriber barriers and enablers to changing prescribing behaviour is critical to the development of targeted interventions aimed at deprescribing PIMs and reducing the risk of iatrogenic harm.

Citing Articles

Deprescribing psychoactive drugs in older orthogeriatric patients: findings from the GIOG2.0 Italian survey.

Cavalli A, De Vincentis A, Pedone C, Laudisio A, Santoro L, Ferrara M BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):138.

PMID: 40025484 PMC: 11871694. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-025-05695-1.


Polypharmacy Prevalence Among Older Adults Based on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: An Update.

Bonanno E, Figueiredo T, Mimoso I, Morgado M, Carrilho J, Midao L J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004860 PMC: 11856818. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041330.


Deprescribing in Australian residential aged care facilities: A scoping review.

Liang J, Thai L, Healy M, Idris A, Chin J, Grossman C Australas J Ageing. 2025; 44(1):e13415.

PMID: 39985190 PMC: 11845899. DOI: 10.1111/ajag.13415.


Challenges and barriers to physician decision-making for prescribing and deprescribing among patients with multimorbidity in eastern China's primary care settings: a qualitative study.

Zhou X, Han L, Farmer A, Yao M, Xia Y, Yan M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e095063.

PMID: 39922587 PMC: 11808900. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095063.


Pharmacist-Mediated Deprescribing in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review.

Goncalves J, Magalhaes N, Machado S, Ramalhinho I, Cavaco A Pharmacy (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39846626 PMC: 11755577. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13010003.


References
1.
Moen J, Norrgard S, Antonov K, Nilsson J, Ring L . GPs' perceptions of multiple-medicine use in older patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01116.x. View

2.
Parr J, Kavanagh D, Young R, McCafferty K . Views of general practitioners and benzodiazepine users on benzodiazepines: a qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 62(5):1237-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.016. View

3.
Somers M, Rose E, Simmonds D, Whitelaw C, Calver J, Beer C . Quality use of medicines in residential aged care. Aust Fam Physician. 2010; 39(6):413-6. View

4.
Subelj M, Vidmar G, Svab V . Prescription of benzodiazepines in Slovenian family medicine: a qualitative study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010; 122(15-16):474-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-010-1413-2. View

5.
Anthierens S, Tansens A, Petrovic M, Christiaens T . Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy. BMC Fam Pract. 2010; 11:65. PMC: 2945967. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-65. View