» Articles » PMID: 25487711

Dynamic Patient Grouping and Prioritization: a New Approach to Emergency Department Flow Improvement

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Dec 10
PMID 25487711
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The demand on emergency departments (ED) is variable and ever increasing, often leaving them overcrowded. Many hospitals are utilizing triage algorithms to rapidly sort and classify patients based on the severity of their injury or illness, however, most current triage methods are prone to over- or under-triage. In this paper, the group technology (GT) concept is applied to the triage process to develop a dynamic grouping and prioritization (DGP) algorithm. This algorithm identifies most appropriate patient groups and prioritizes them according to patient- and system-related information. Discrete event simulation (DES) has been implemented to investigate the impact of the DGP algorithm on the performance measures of the ED system. The impact was studied in comparison with the currently used triage algorithm, i.e., emergency severity index (ESI). The DGP algorithm outperforms the ESI algorithm by shortening patients' average length of stay (LOS), average time to bed (TTB), time in emergency room, and lowering the percentage of tardy patients and their associated risk in the system.

Citing Articles

q-Rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic WASPAS algorithm for patients' prioritization based on prioritized Maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators.

Abbas F, Ali J, Mashwani W, Gunduz N, Syam M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10659.

PMID: 38724560 PMC: 11538463. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57452-w.


Main Features and Control Strategies to Reduce Overcrowding in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Maninchedda M, Proia A, Bianco L, Aromatario M, Orsi G, Napoli C Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023; 16:255-266.

PMID: 36852330 PMC: 9961148. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S399045.


Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

Ortiz-Barrios M, Coba-Blanco D, Alfaro-Saiz J, Stand-Gonzalez D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16).

PMID: 34444561 PMC: 8392152. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168814.


Optimization of Patient Flow in Urgent Care Centers Using a Digital Tool for Recording Patient Symptoms and History: Simulation Study.

Montazeri M, Multmeier J, Novorol C, Upadhyay S, Wicks P, Gilbert S JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(5):e26402.

PMID: 34018963 PMC: 8178735. DOI: 10.2196/26402.


E-Triage Systems for COVID-19 Outbreak: Review and Recommendations.

Alhaidari F, Almuhaideb A, Alsunaidi S, Ibrahim N, Aslam N, Khan I Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(8).

PMID: 33920744 PMC: 8072881. DOI: 10.3390/s21082845.


References
1.
Eitel D, Travers D, Rosenau A, Gilboy N, Wuerz R . The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(10):1070-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00577.x. View

2.
Richardson L, Hwang U . America's Health Care Safety Net: intact or unraveling?. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(11):1056-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01115.x. View

3.
Andersson A, Omberg M, Svedlund M . Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. Nurs Crit Care. 2006; 11(3):136-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00162.x. View

4.
Hoot N, Aronsky D . Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52(2):126-36. PMC: 7340358. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.014. View

5.
Goransson K, Ehnfors M, Fonteyn M, Ehrenberg A . Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 61(2):163-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04473.x. View