» Articles » PMID: 25486987

Reducing Radiation Exposure in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: It is More Than Just Fluoroscopy Times!

Overview
Date 2014 Dec 10
PMID 25486987
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To exposure in patients undergoing cardiac electrophysiology (EP) ablation. This included the use of a "very low" dose protocol, and the impact of angulations and patient body mass index (BMI) on radiation dose as a mean to reduce exposure.

Methods: A total of 212 retrospective patient data sets were collected during EP ablation procedures on a biplane fluoroscopy system. Dose metrics were computed based on dose-area product (DAP) measured by the system for each x-ray acquisition.

Results: Dose baselines of different ablation procedures were established as DAP and DAP per hour, with respect to patient BMI. The use of a "very low dose" protocol reduced exposure by 62% while providing adequate image quality. With approximate left anterior oblique (LAO) 50° and right anterior oblique (RAO) 30°, DAP and DAP rate were significantly higher in LAO compared to RAO (11.2 [4.8-25.3] Gy · cm(2) vs 5.28 [2.9-11.1] Gy · cm(2) and 74.0 [38.2-136.1] Gy · cm(2)/h vs 25.0 [16.4-44.1] Gy · cm(2)/h, respectively; P < 0.001). DAP and DAP rate were also significantly higher in patients with BMI > 30 vs BMI ≤ 30 (34.2 [22.3-58.7] Gy · cm(2) vs 12.4 [6.0-26.9] Gy · cm(2) and 84.9 [68.1-120.4] Gy · cm(2)/h vs 34.2 [21.7-52.9] Gy · cm(2)/h, respectively; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Protocol setting, system angulation, and BMI, in particular, wider angulation in LAO compared to RAO plane, exposes patients to significant higher radiation doses. Obese patients in standard LAO plane receive six times the radiation dose of nonobese patients in RAO.

Citing Articles

Results from a real-time dosimetry study during left atrial ablations performed with ultra-low dose radiation settings.

Schreiber T, Kahler N, Biewener S, Tscholl V, Nagel P, Attanasio P Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2021; 32(2):244-249.

PMID: 33977306 PMC: 8166725. DOI: 10.1007/s00399-021-00762-7.


What factors affect fluoroscopy use during Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia?.

Wylie J, McClincy M, Stieler E, Millis M, Kim Y, Peters C J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019; 6(3):259-264.

PMID: 31798928 PMC: 6874767. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnz035.


Physicians' exposure to radiation during electrophysiology procedures.

Faroux L, Daval C, Lesaffre F, Blanpain T, Chabert J, Martin A J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019; 55(2):233-237.

PMID: 31177353 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00568-1.


Fluoroscopy integrating technology in a 3D mapping system during ablation of atrial arrhythmias: first experiences.

Blockhaus C, Schmidt J, Kurt M, Clasen L, Muller P, Brinkmeyer C Arch Med Sci. 2018; 14(4):794-800.

PMID: 30002696 PMC: 6040117. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61944.


Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Yamagata K, Aldhoon B, Kautzner J Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016; 5(2):144-9.

PMID: 27617094 PMC: 5013175. DOI: 10.15420/AER.2016.16.2.