» Articles » PMID: 25485733

Decision Criterion Dynamics in Animals Performing an Auditory Detection Task

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Dec 9
PMID 25485733
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classical signal detection theory attributes bias in perceptual decisions to a threshold criterion, against which sensory excitation is compared. The optimal criterion setting depends on the signal level, which may vary over time, and about which the subject is naïve. Consequently, the subject must optimise its threshold by responding appropriately to feedback. Here a series of experiments was conducted, and a computational model applied, to determine how the decision bias of the ferret in an auditory signal detection task tracks changes in the stimulus level. The time scales of criterion dynamics were investigated by means of a yes-no signal-in-noise detection task, in which trials were grouped into blocks that alternately contained easy- and hard-to-detect signals. The responses of the ferrets implied both long- and short-term criterion dynamics. The animals exhibited a bias in favour of responding "yes" during blocks of harder trials, and vice versa. Moreover, the outcome of each single trial had a strong influence on the decision at the next trial. We demonstrate that the single-trial and block-level changes in bias are a manifestation of the same criterion update policy by fitting a model, in which the criterion is shifted by fixed amounts according to the outcome of the previous trial and decays strongly towards a resting value. The apparent block-level stabilisation of bias arises as the probabilities of outcomes and shifts on single trials mutually interact to establish equilibrium. To gain an intuition into how stable criterion distributions arise from specific parameter sets we develop a Markov model which accounts for the dynamic effects of criterion shifts. Our approach provides a framework for investigating the dynamics of decisions at different timescales in other species (e.g., humans) and in other psychological domains (e.g., vision, memory).

Citing Articles

Prior experience modifies acquisition trajectories via response-strategy sampling.

Daniels C, Balsam P Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(4):1217-1239.

PMID: 37036556 PMC: 11034823. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01769-y.


Estrogenic Modulation of Retinal Sensitivity in Reproductive Female Túngara Frogs.

Leslie C, Walkowski W, Rosencrans R, Gordon W, Bazan N, Ryan M Integr Comp Biol. 2021; 61(1):231-239.

PMID: 33901287 PMC: 8300951. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab032.


Signal detection: applying analysis methods from psychology to animal behaviour.

Sumner C, Sumner S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1802):20190480.

PMID: 32420861 PMC: 7331002. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0480.


Optimising the Structure-Function Relationship at the Locus of Deficit in Retinal Disease.

Phu J, Kalloniatis M, Wang H, Khuu S Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:306.

PMID: 31024235 PMC: 6467237. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00306.


Mistuning detection performance of ferrets in a go/no-go task.

Homma N, Bajo V, Happel M, Nodal F, King A J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 139(6):EL246.

PMID: 27369180 PMC: 7116551. DOI: 10.1121/1.4954378.


References
1.
Brunton B, Botvinick M, Brody C . Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making. Science. 2013; 340(6128):95-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1233912. View

2.
Sugrue L, Corrado G, Newsome W . Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science. 2004; 304(5678):1782-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1094765. View

3.
HACK M . Signal detection in the rat. Science. 1963; 139(3556):758-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.139.3556.758. View

4.
Klein S . Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Percept Psychophys. 2002; 63(8):1421-55. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194552. View

5.
Blough D . Some contributions of signal detection theory to the analysis of stimulus control in animals. Behav Processes. 2001; 54(1-3):127-136. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00154-1. View