» Articles » PMID: 25480110

Prediction of Revascularization After Myocardial Perfusion SPECT by Machine Learning in a Large Population

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2014 Dec 7
PMID 25480110
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate if early revascularization in patients with suspected coronary artery disease can be effectively predicted by integrating clinical data and quantitative image features derived from perfusion SPECT (MPS) by machine learning (ML) approach.

Methods: 713 rest (201)Thallium/stress (99m)Technetium MPS studies with correlating invasive angiography with 372 revascularization events (275 PCI/97 CABG) within 90 days after MPS (91% within 30 days) were considered. Transient ischemic dilation, stress combined supine/prone total perfusion deficit (TPD), supine rest and stress TPD, exercise ejection fraction, and end-systolic volume, along with clinical parameters including patient gender, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, ST-depression on baseline ECG, ECG and clinical response during stress, and post-ECG probability by boosted ensemble ML algorithm (LogitBoost) to predict revascularization events. These features were selected using an automated feature selection algorithm from all available clinical and quantitative data (33 parameters). Tenfold cross-validation was utilized to train and test the prediction model. The prediction of revascularization by ML algorithm was compared to standalone measures of perfusion and visual analysis by two experienced readers utilizing all imaging, quantitative, and clinical data.

Results: The sensitivity of machine learning (ML) (73.6% ± 4.3%) for prediction of revascularization was similar to one reader (73.9% ± 4.6%) and standalone measures of perfusion (75.5% ± 4.5%). The specificity of ML (74.7% ± 4.2%) was also better than both expert readers (67.2% ± 4.9% and 66.0% ± 5.0%, P < .05), but was similar to ischemic TPD (68.3% ± 4.9%, P < .05). The receiver operator characteristics areas under curve for ML (0.81 ± 0.02) was similar to reader 1 (0.81 ± 0.02) but superior to reader 2 (0.72 ± 0.02, P < .01) and standalone measure of perfusion (0.77 ± 0.02, P < .01).

Conclusion: ML approach is comparable or better than experienced readers in prediction of the early revascularization after MPS, and is significantly better than standalone measures of perfusion derived from MPS.

Citing Articles

Applications of Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction and Diagnosis of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Oncology Patients.

Scalia I, Pathangey G, Abdelnabi M, Ibrahim O, Abdelfattah F, Pereyra Pietri M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002200 PMC: 11852369. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040605.


A deep learning-based automated diagnosis system for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Kusumoto D, Akiyama T, Hashimoto M, Iwabuchi Y, Katsuki T, Kimura M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13583.

PMID: 38866884 PMC: 11169468. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64445-2.


Comparative analysis of supervised learning algorithms for prediction of cardiovascular diseases.

Dou Y, Liu J, Meng W, Zhang Y Technol Health Care. 2024; 32(S1):241-251.

PMID: 38759053 PMC: 11191474. DOI: 10.3233/THC-248021.


Machine Learning for Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Prediction on Electrocardiogram Gated Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.

Shimizu M, Kimura S, Fujii H, Suzuki M, Nishizaki M, Sasano T Ann Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 9(1):11-18.

PMID: 38058573 PMC: 10696148. DOI: 10.17996/anc.22-00155.


Patient-level explainable machine learning to predict major adverse cardiovascular events from SPECT MPI and CCTA imaging.

Alahdab F, El Shawi R, Ahmed A, Han Y, Al-Mallah M PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0291451.

PMID: 37967112 PMC: 10651041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291451.


References
1.
Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman J, Cohen I, Berman D . Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003; 107(23):2900-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41. View

2.
Matsumoto N, Berman D, Kavanagh P, Gerlach J, Hayes S, Lewin H . Quantitative assessment of motion artifacts and validation of a new motion-correction program for myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(5):687-94. View

3.
Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V, Jacobs A, Kaul S, Laskey W . Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002; 105(4):539-42. DOI: 10.1161/hc0402.102975. View

4.
Danias P, Ahlberg A, Travin M, Mahr N, Abreu J, Marini D . Visual assessment of left ventricular perfusion and function with electrocardiography-gated SPECT has high intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility among experienced nuclear cardiologists and cardiology trainees. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002; 9(3):263-70. DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2002.121233. View

5.
Klocke F, Baird M, Lorell B, Bateman T, Messer J, Berman D . ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995.... Circulation. 2003; 108(11):1404-18. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080946.42225.4D. View