» Articles » PMID: 25478146

Optimizing Occupancy Surveys by Maximizing Detection Probability: Application to Amphibian Monitoring in the Mediterranean Region

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2014 Dec 6
PMID 25478146
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Setting up effective conservation strategies requires the precise determination of the targeted species' distribution area and, if possible, its local abundance. However, detection issues make these objectives complex for most vertebrates. The detection probability is usually <1 and is highly dependent on species phenology and other environmental variables. The aim of this study was to define an optimized survey protocol for the Mediterranean amphibian community, that is, to determine the most favorable periods and the most effective sampling techniques for detecting all species present on a site in a minimum number of field sessions and a minimum amount of prospecting effort. We visited 49 ponds located in the Languedoc region of southern France on four occasions between February and June 2011. Amphibians were detected using three methods: nighttime call count, nighttime visual encounter, and daytime netting. The detection nondetection data obtained was then modeled using site-occupancy models. The detection probability of amphibians sharply differed between species, the survey method used and the date of the survey. These three covariates also interacted. Thus, a minimum of three visits spread over the breeding season, using a combination of all three survey methods, is needed to reach a 95% detection level for all species in the Mediterranean region. Synthesis and applications: detection nondetection surveys combined to site occupancy modeling approach are powerful methods that can be used to estimate the detection probability and to determine the prospecting effort necessary to assert that a species is absent from a site.

Citing Articles

Improving Inference Within Freshwater Community Studies: Accounting for Variable Detection Rates of Amphibians and Fish.

Hamer A, Horanyi J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70383.

PMID: 39421331 PMC: 11483536. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70383.


Hydrology is a major influence on amphibian abundance in a large European floodplain.

Hamer A, Czegledi I, Gal B, Saly P, Szaloky Z, Preiszner B Freshw Biol. 2024; 68(8):1303-1318.

PMID: 38516301 PMC: 10952816. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.14104.


Environmental DNA and visual encounter surveys for amphibian biomonitoring in aquatic environments of the Ecuadorian Amazon.

Quilumbaquin W, Carrera-Gonzalez A, Van der Heyden C, Ortega-Andrade H PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15455.

PMID: 37456876 PMC: 10348306. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15455.


Detectability and impact of repetitive surveys on threatened West African crocodylians.

Ahizi M, Kouman C, Ouattara A, Kouame N, Dede A, Fairet E Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(21):15062-15076.

PMID: 34765160 PMC: 8571622. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8188.


How citizen science could improve species distribution models and their independent assessment.

Matutini F, Baudry J, Pain G, Sineau M, Pithon J Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(7):3028-3039.

PMID: 33841764 PMC: 8019030. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7210.


References
1.
Fitzpatrick M, Preisser E, Ellison A, Elkinton J . Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19(7):1673-9. DOI: 10.1890/09-0265.1. View

2.
Cleary D . The questionable effectiveness of science spending by international conservation organizations in the tropics. Conserv Biol. 2006; 20(3):733-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00413.x. View

3.
Stuart S, Chanson J, Cox N, Young B, Rodrigues A, Fischman D . Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004; 306(5702):1783-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1103538. View

4.
Jourdan-Pineau H, David P, Crochet P . Phenotypic plasticity allows the Mediterranean parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus to exploit two temporal niches under continuous gene flow. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(4):876-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05420.x. View

5.
Tanadini L, Schmidt B . Population size influences amphibian detection probability: implications for biodiversity monitoring programs. PLoS One. 2011; 6(12):e28244. PMC: 3229540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028244. View