The Cutoff Level of Free/total Prostate Specific Antigen (f/t PSA) Ratios in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Validation Study on a Turkish Patient Population in Different Age Categories
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We investigated an optimal cutoff level of free/total PSA ratios (f/t PSA) in predicting prostate cancer in different age groups, focusing on the avoidance of unnecessary prostate biopsies. A total of 4955 men were enrolled into the study. Serum tPSA, fPSA, and f/t PSA ratios were determined for the study population. All males who had suspicious digital rectal examination and tPSA > 4 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each group were generated by plotting the sensitivity versus 1-specificity for the f/t PSA ratio. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were obtained using various f/t PSA ratio cutoffs for different age groups. There were 657 patients with a PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL. According to sensitivity and specificity f/t% PSA cutoff points were determined to be 10%, 15%, 15%, and 10% in 50-59 years, 60-69 years, >70 years, and all ages categories, respectively, in patients with initial PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL. f/t PSA ratio had an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.81 (95% confidence level: 0.80-0.82) for all age groups in detecting prostate cancer. f/t PSA ratio has an AUC value of 0.669 (0.632-0.705) in detecting prostate cancer among patients with a PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL. Ten percent of f/t PSA ratio had the highest specificity with PLR and 30% f/t PSA ratio had the highest sensitivity with lower NLR in the all-age categories. The current study shows that the use of f/t PSA ratio in patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL should enhance the specificity of PSA screening and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies. The age-related changes warrant further investigation in a large, multicentric, and multinational population to improve the clinical use of f/t PSA cutoffs.
Deng J, Hua J, Zeng T, Que H, Zhang Q, Li Q World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):538.
PMID: 39325178 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05241-5.
Predictive value of controlling nutritional status score for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Huang J, Sun J, Hua R, Fan Y, Wang K, Zheng L Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1268800.
PMID: 38450184 PMC: 10915645. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1268800.
Mirsya Warli S, Firsty N, Velaro A, Tala Z World J Oncol. 2023; 14(5):358-370.
PMID: 37869239 PMC: 10588501. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1635.
Gao X, Miao Q, Zhang J, Zhai J, Gui X, Cai Y Asian J Androl. 2021; 24(2):195-200.
PMID: 34916475 PMC: 8887115. DOI: 10.4103/aja202182.
Xu L, Lee J, Hao S, Ling X, Brooks J, Wang S PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221051.
PMID: 31404106 PMC: 6690541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221051.