» Articles » PMID: 25449904

A Cost Benefit Analysis of the Luminex XTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel for Detection of Infectious Gastroenteritis in Hospitalised Patients

Overview
Journal J Infect
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25449904
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Recent advances in the laboratory detection of infectious diarrhoea allow more rapid and sensitive identification of infected patients. Several commercial multiplex molecular panels are now available and may have significant advantages over culture based techniques. Faster and more sensitive testing of hospitalised patients with suspected infectious gastroenteritis could result in significant efficiencies in the utilisation of isolation facilities, however few studies have examined this potential benefit. We studied the potential clinical and cost benefits of a commercially available molecular panel.

Methods: An eight-month parallel diagnostic study was conducted to measure potential economic benefits of testing hospitalised patients with the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (GPP) compared with conventional laboratory testing (based on a combination of culture, microscopy and enzyme immunoassay). Laboratory testing costs and patient isolation costs were measured or estimated for 800 patients.

Results: Although costing an additional £22,283, use of GPP could enable a reduction in isolation time from 2202 to 1447 days, a saving of £66,765, which more than offsets the additional laboratory testing costs.

Conclusion: Syndromic testing of patients against a broad panel of organisms using a multiplex molecular panel can both improve detection rates and allow better laboratory workflow practices. Removing patients testing negative using this panel could result in significant patient isolation savings.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of....

Lewinski M, Alby K, Babady N, Butler-Wu S, Bard J, Greninger A J Mol Diagn. 2023; 25(12):857-875.

PMID: 37757952 PMC: 11702286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.08.005.


Impact of Rapid Molecular Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Testing in Management of Children during a Outbreak.

Kanwar N, Jackson J, Bardsley T, Pavia A, Bourzac K, Holmberg K J Clin Microbiol. 2023; 61(3):e0165222.

PMID: 36853032 PMC: 10035298. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01652-22.


The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

DiDiodato G, Allen A, Bradbury N, Brown J, Cruise K, Jedrzejko C Cureus. 2022; 14(8):e27931.

PMID: 36120274 PMC: 9464456. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27931.


BD MAX Enteric Bacterial, Bacterial Plus, and Virus Panels for Diagnosis of Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis: a Cost-Benefit Analysis.

Ferrer J, Gimenez E, Carretero D, Buesa J, Morillas F, Granell R Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10(5):e0088022.

PMID: 36069590 PMC: 9603360. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00880-22.


Changing Diagnostic Testing Practices for Foodborne Pathogens, Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 2012-2019.

Ray L, Griffin P, Wymore K, Wilson E, Hurd S, LaClair B Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(8):ofac344.

PMID: 35928506 PMC: 9345410. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac344.