» Articles » PMID: 25448799

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of a Novel Procedure: Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25448799
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel strategy to resect liver tumors despite the small size of the liver remnant. It is an hepatectomy in two stages, with PVL and parenchymal transection during the first stage, which induces rapid growth of the remnant liver exceeding any other technique. Despite high postoperative morbidity and mortality in most reports, the technique was adopted by a number of surgeons.

Materials And Methods: This systematic review explores current data regarding the feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy of ALPPS; the search strategy has been published online. A meta-analysis of hypertrophy, feasibility (ALPPS stage 2 performed), mortality, complications, and R0 (complete) resection was performed.

Results: A literature search revealed a total of 13 publications that met the search criteria, reporting data from 295 patients. Evidence levels were low, with the highest Oxford evidence level being 2c. The most common indication was colorectal liver metastasis in 203 patients. Hypertrophy in the meta-analysis was 84 %, feasibility (ALPPS stage 2 performed) 97 % (CI 94-99 %), 90-day mortality 11 % (CI 8-16 %), and complications grade IIIa or higher occured in 44 % (CI 38-50 %) of patients. A standardized reporting format for complications is lacking despite the widespread use of the Clavien-Dindo classification. Oncological outcome is not well-documented. The most common topics in the selected studies published were technical feasibility and indications for the procedures. Publication bias due to case-series and single-center reports is common.

Conclusion: A systematic exploration of this novel operation with a rigid methodology, such as registry analyses and a randomized controlled trial, is highly advised.

Citing Articles

Liver venous deprivation (LVD) before extended hepatectomy: a French multicentric retrospective cohort.

Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Pecquenard F, Maulat C, Buc E, Sulpice L Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024; 13(6):937-949.

PMID: 39669088 PMC: 11634414. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-315.


Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR.

Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Adam J, Lapuyade B, Debordeaux F, Tlili G Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):9205-9220.

PMID: 39230854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9.


Overcome intraoperative difficulties of ALPPS procedure: a single-center outcomes and technical experience.

Pham A, Truong C, Trinh P Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(7):3833-3840.

PMID: 38989190 PMC: 11230825. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002161.


Application of the IDEAL framework in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a review of the literature.

Wu Y, Guo J, Peng W Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 409(1):20.

PMID: 38153558 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03211-w.


Comparison of clinical efficacy between LAPS and ALPPS in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chen Z, Shen S, Xie W, Liao J, Feng S, Li S Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023; 11:goad060.

PMID: 37842201 PMC: 10570994. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad060.