» Articles » PMID: 25442337

Toxicity After Central Versus Peripheral Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: a Propensity Score Matched-pair Analysis

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25442337
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for "central" tumors-within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree or with planning tumor volume (PTV) touching mediastinum-versus noncentral ("peripheral") lung tumors.

Methods And Materials: From November 2005 to January 2011, 229 tumors (110 central, 119 peripheral; T1-3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer and limited lung metastases) in 196 consecutive patients followed prospectively at a single institution received moderate-dose SBRT (48-60 Gy in 4-5 fractions [biologic effective dose=100-132 Gy, α/β=10]) using 4-dimensional planning, online image-guided radiation therapy, and institutional dose constraints. Clinical adverse events (AEs) were graded prospectively at clinical and radiographic follow-up using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Pulmonary function test (PFT) decline was graded as 2 (25%-49.9% decline), 3 (50.0%-74.9% decline), or 4 (≥75.0% decline). Central/peripheral location was assessed retrospectively on planning CT scans. Groups were compared after propensity score matching. Characteristics were compared with χ(2) and 2-tailed t tests, adverse events with χ(2) test-for-trend, and cumulative incidence using competing risks analysis (Gray's test).

Results: With 79 central and 79 peripheral tumors matched, no differences in AEs were observed after 17 months median follow-up. Two-year cumulative incidences of grade ≥2 pain, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and skin AEs were 14%, 5%, 6%, and 10% (central) versus 19%, 10%, 10%, and 3% (peripheral), respectively (P=.31, .38, .70, and .09). Grade ≥2 cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system AEs were rare (<1%). Two-year incidences of grade ≥2 clinical AEs (28% vs 25%, P=.79), grade ≥2 PFT decline (36% vs 34%, P=.94), grade ≥3 clinical AEs (3% vs 7%, P=.48), and grade ≥3 PFT decline (0 vs 10%, P=.11) were similar for central versus peripheral tumors, respectively. Pooled 2-year incidences of grades 4 and 5 AEs were <1% and 0%, respectively, in both the prematched and matched groups.

Conclusion: Moderate-dose SBRT with these techniques yields a similarly safe toxicity profile for both central and peripheral lung tumors.

Citing Articles

A Comparison of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Elderly Patients with Central or Peripheral Stage I-II (T1-3 N0 M0) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Ji X, Shi X, Hu J, Jiang W, Zhou B, Zhou H Cancer Manag Res. 2024; 16:1557-1570.

PMID: 39525495 PMC: 11549890. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S483569.


A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation.

Park H, Detterbeck F, Madoff D, Bade B, Kumbasar U, Mase Jr V J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(6):2412-2436.

PMID: 35813762 PMC: 9264060. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1826.


Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases.

Falcinelli L, Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Ingrosso G Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(1):23-31.

PMID: 35402023 PMC: 8989443. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0002.


Variation of Tumor Volume During Moderate Hypo-Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Nishimura K, Hatanaka S, Utsumi N, Yamano T, Shimbo M, Takahashi T Cureus. 2021; 13(9):e17743.

PMID: 34659956 PMC: 8491798. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17743.


Estimating the tolerance of brachial plexus to hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy: a modelling-based approach from clinical experience.

Kapitanova I, Biswas S, Divekar S, Kemmerer E, Rostock R, Forster K Radiat Oncol. 2021; 16(1):98.

PMID: 34098991 PMC: 8186142. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01822-5.