» Articles » PMID: 25442228

Receipt of Diabetes Preventive Services Differs by Insurance Status at Visit

Overview
Journal Am J Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25442228
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lack of insurance is associated with suboptimal receipt of diabetes preventive care. One known reason for this is an access barrier to obtaining healthcare visits; however, little is known about whether insurance status is associated with differential rates of receipt of diabetes care during visits.

Purpose: To examine the association between health insurance and receipt of diabetes preventive care during an office visit.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record and Medicaid data from 38 Oregon community health centers. Logistic regression was used to test the association between insurance and receipt of four diabetes services during an office visit among patients who were continuously uninsured (n=1,117); continuously insured (n=1,466); and discontinuously insured (n=336) in 2006-2007. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for within-patient correlation. Data were analyzed in 2013.

Results: Overall, continuously uninsured patients had lower odds of receiving services at visits when due, compared to those who were continuously insured (AOR=0.73, 95% CI=0.66, 0.80). Among the discontinuously insured, being uninsured at a visit was associated with lower odds of receipt of services due at that visit (AOR=0.77, 95% CI=0.64, 0.92) than being insured at a visit.

Conclusions: Lack of insurance is associated with a lower probability of receiving recommended services that are due during a clinic visit. Thus, the association between being uninsured and receiving fewer preventive services may not be completely mediated by access to clinic visits.

Citing Articles

Healthcare Utilization and Chronic Disease Management for Non-Medicaid-Eligible Patients in a City-Wide Safety-Net Healthcare Access Program.

Meltzer K, Chen K, Zhang C, Zhou S, Long T, Jimenez J J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 40(2):430-436.

PMID: 39103607 PMC: 11803054. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08983-5.


Association of a Patient's Type of Insurance With Preventive Service Delivery.

Ozkardes C, Harman PhD J Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44927.

PMID: 37818517 PMC: 10560607. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44927.


Diabetes And The Fragmented State Of US Health Care And Policy.

Chehal P, Selvin E, DeVoe J, Mangione C, Ali M Health Aff (Millwood). 2022; 41(7):939-946.

PMID: 35759725 PMC: 10420383. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00299.


Evaluating efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care using data envelopment analysis.

Kang H, Kim S, Malloy K, McMurry T, Balkrishnan R, Anderson R Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021; 21(3):324-338.

PMID: 34824558 PMC: 8612454. DOI: 10.1007/s10742-020-00237-1.


Rates of Undiagnosed Hypertension and Diagnosed Hypertension Without Anti-hypertensive Medication Following the Affordable Care Act.

Huguet N, Larson A, Angier H, Marino M, Green B, Moreno L Am J Hypertens. 2021; 34(9):989-998.

PMID: 33929496 PMC: 8457435. DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpab069.


References
1.
Robinson J, Shavers V . The role of health insurance coverage in cancer screening utilization. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19(3):842-56. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0048. View

2.
Jerant A, Fiscella K, Tancredi D, Franks P . Health insurance is associated with preventive care but not personal health behaviors. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013; 26(6):759-67. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.06.130054. View

3.
Schoen C, Desroches C . Uninsured and unstably insured: the importance of continuous insurance coverage. Health Serv Res. 2000; 35(1 Pt 2):187-206. PMC: 1089095. View

4.
Kasper J, Giovannini T, Hoffman C . Gaining and losing health insurance: strengthening the evidence for effects on access to care and health outcomes. Med Care Res Rev. 2000; 57(3):298-318; discussion 319-25. DOI: 10.1177/107755870005700302. View

5.
Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen G, Parving H, Pedersen O . Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(5):383-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021778. View