» Articles » PMID: 25439006

Effectiveness of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Care: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMC Pulm Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2014 Dec 3
PMID 25439006
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of computerized clinical decision support systems may improve the diagnosis and ongoing management of chronic diseases, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, disease and medication monitoring and modification of patient behavior. The aim of this review was to systematically review randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision systems (CCDSS) in the care of people with asthma and COPD.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2013 were searched using multiple electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, IPA, Informit, PsychINFO, Compendex, and Cochrane Clinical Controlled Trials Register databases. To be included, RCTs had to evaluate the role of the CCDSSs for asthma and/or COPD in primary care.

Results: Nineteen studies representing 16 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The majority of the trials were conducted in patients with asthma. Study quality was generally high. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of methodological and clinical heterogeneity. The use of CCDSS improved asthma and COPD care in 14 of the 19 studies reviewed (74%). Nine of the nineteen studies showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the primary outcomes measured. The majority of the studies evaluated health care process measures as their primary outcomes (10/19).

Conclusion: Evidence supports the effectiveness of CCDSS in the care of people with asthma. However there is very little information of its use in COPD care. Although there is considerable improvement in the health care process measures and clinical outcomes through the use of CCDSSs, its effects on user workload and efficiency, safety, costs of care, provider and patient satisfaction remain understudied.

Citing Articles

Electronic health record-based behaviour change interventions aimed at general practitioners in the UK: a mixed methods systematic review using behaviour change theory.

Soames J, Pettigrew L BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e080546.

PMID: 38816046 PMC: 11141199. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080546.


Clinical decision support systems for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in hospitals: A systematic review.

Bamgboje-Ayodele A, Borg D, McPhail S, Baysari M Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231219107.

PMID: 38089165 PMC: 10714883. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231219107.


Developing and applying synergistic multilevel implementation strategies to promote reach of an evidence-based parenting intervention in primary care.

Schilling S, Bigal L, Powell B Implement Res Pract. 2023; 3:26334895221091219.

PMID: 37091079 PMC: 9924241. DOI: 10.1177/26334895221091219.


Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review.

Fletcher E, Burns A, Wiering B, Lavu D, Shephard E, Hamilton W BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):23.

PMID: 36670354 PMC: 9857918. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2.


Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Primary Care Asthma Paediatric Pathway: a qualitative analysis.

Sharpe H, Potestio M, Cave A, Johnson D, Scott S BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5):e058950.

PMID: 35551084 PMC: 9109122. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058950.


References
1.
Bryan C, Boren S . The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature. Inform Prim Care. 2008; 16(2):79-91. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i2.679. View

2.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V . Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2095-128. PMC: 10790329. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. View

3.
Bahadori K, Doyle-Waters M, Marra C, Lynd L, Alasaly K, Swiston J . Economic burden of asthma: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2009; 9:24. PMC: 2698859. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-24. View

4.
Taylor B, Dinh M, Kwok R, Dinh D, Chu M, Tang E . Electronic interface for emergency department management of asthma: a randomized control trial of clinician performance. Emerg Med Australas. 2007; 20(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01040.x. View

5.
Martens J, van der Weijden T, Winkens R, Kester A, Geerts P, Evers S . Feasibility and acceptability of a computerised system with automated reminders for prescribing behaviour in primary care. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 77(3):199-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.013. View