Assessment of Bacterial and Archaeal Community Structure in Swine Wastewater Treatment Processes
Overview
Microbiology
Authors
Affiliations
Microbial communities from two field-scale swine wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were assessed by pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragments. Effluent samples from secondary (anaerobic covered lagoons and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket [UASB]) and tertiary treatment systems (open-pond natural attenuation lagoon and air-sparged nitrification-denitrification tank followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation process) were analyzed. A total of 56,807 and 48,859 high-quality reads were obtained from bacterial and archaeal libraries, respectively. Dominant bacterial communities were associated with the phylum Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. Bacteria and archaea diversity were highest in UASB effluent sample. Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and/or Prevotella were used as indicators of putative pathogen reduction throughout the WWTPs. Satisfactory pathogen reduction was observed after the open-pond natural attenuation lagoon but not after the air-sparged nitrification/denitrification followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation treatment processes. Among the archaeal communities, 80% of the reads was related to hydrogeno-trophic methanogens Methanospirillum. Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens detected in effluent samples from the anaerobic covered lagoons and UASB suggested that CO2 reduction with H2 was the dominant methanogenic pathway in these systems. Overall, the results served to improve our current understanding of major microbial communities' changes downgradient from the pen and throughout swine WWTP as a result of different treatment processes.
A comparative genomics study of the microbiome and freshwater resistome in Southern Pantanal.
de Oliveira A, de Toledo Ros B, Jardim R, Kotowski N, de Barros A, Pereira R Front Genet. 2024; 15:1352801.
PMID: 38699231 PMC: 11063290. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1352801.
Yang Z, Lou Y, Pan H, Wang H, Yang Q, Zhuge Y Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).
PMID: 36850087 PMC: 9958998. DOI: 10.3390/polym15040801.
Zhang Y, Li X, Lu L, Huang F, Liu H, Zhang Y Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2).
PMID: 36838198 PMC: 9966171. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020233.
Plaza G, Jalowiecki L, Glowacka D, Hubeny J, Harnisz M, Korzeniewska E PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0250514.
PMID: 33901216 PMC: 8075261. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250514.
Swine manure valorization in fabrication of nutrition and energy.
Giwa A, Ali N, Asif M Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 104(23):9921-9933.
PMID: 33074416 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10963-8.