» Articles » PMID: 25431623

Description of a Multidisciplinary Initiative to Improve SCIP Measures Related to Pre-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Compliance: a Single-center Success Story

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Nov 29
PMID 25431623
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was launched in 2005. The core prophylactic perioperative antibiotic guidelines were created due to recognition of the impact of proper perioperative prophylaxis on an estimated annual one million inpatient days and $1.6 billion in excess health care costs secondary to preventable surgical site infections (SSIs). An internal study was conducted to create low cost, standardized processes on an institutional level to improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic administration.

Methods: We assessed the impact of auditing and notifying providers of SCIP errors on overall compliance with inpatient antibiotic guidelines and on net financial gain or loss to a large tertiary center between March 1st 2010 and September 31st 2013. We hypothesized that direct physician-to-physician feedback would result in significant compliance improvements.

Results: Through physician notification, our hospital was able to significantly improve SCIP compliance and emphasis on patient safety within a year of intervention implementation. The hospital earned an additional $290,612 in 2011 and $209,096 in 2012 for re-investment in patient care initiatives.

Conclusions: Provider education and direct notification of SCIP prophylactic antibiotic dosing errors resulted in improved compliance with national patient improvement guidelines. There were differences between the anesthesiology and surgery department feedback responses, the latter likely attributed to diverse surgical department sub-divisions, frequent changes in resident trainees and supervising attending staff, and the comparative ability. Provider notification of guideline non-compliance should be encouraged as standard practice to improve patient safety. Also, the hospital experienced increased revenue for re-investment in patient care as a secondary result of provider notification.

Citing Articles

Dashboard of Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Anesthesiologists: Development and Preliminary Evaluation.

Sreepada R, Chang A, West N, Sujan J, Lai B, Poznikoff A JMIR Perioper Med. 2023; 6:e47398.

PMID: 37725426 PMC: 10548316. DOI: 10.2196/47398.


Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: An Educative Intervention Significantly Increases Compliance.

Martzivanou E, Psarras K, Monioudis P, Vamvakis K, Nikolaidou C, Geropoulos G J Clin Med Res. 2021; 13(3):170-176.

PMID: 33854657 PMC: 8016525. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4447.


Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review.

Hassan S, Chan V, Stevens J, Stupans I Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):29.

PMID: 33453730 PMC: 7811740. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01577-w.


Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: a systematic review.

Nathwani D, Varghese D, Stephens J, Ansari W, Martin S, Charbonneau C Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019; 8:35.

PMID: 30805182 PMC: 6373132. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0471-0.


Improving antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery patients: A quality improvement project.

Kilan R, Moran D, Eid I, Okeahialam C, Quinn C, Binsaddiq W Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 20:6-12.

PMID: 28663796 PMC: 5480815. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.06.018.

References
1.
Cataife G, Weinberg D, Wong H, Kahn K . The effect of Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) compliance on surgical site infections (SSI). Med Care. 2014; 52(2 Suppl 1):S66-73. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000028. View

2.
Broex E, van Asselt A, Bruggeman C, van Tiel F . Surgical site infections: how high are the costs?. J Hosp Infect. 2009; 72(3):193-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.020. View

3.
Kirkland K, Briggs J, Trivette S, WILKINSON W, Sexton D . The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20(11):725-30. DOI: 10.1086/501572. View

4.
Dellinger E, Gross P, Barrett T, Krause P, Martone W, McGowan Jr J . Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 1994; 18(3):422-7. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/18.3.422. View

5.
Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J, French S . Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (6):CD000259. PMC: 11338587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3. View