Balon R, Louie A, Morreale M, Seritan A, Guerrero A, Thomas L
Acad Psychiatry. 2024; 48(6):563-567.
PMID: 39158779
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-024-02021-6.
Bell K, Kingori P, Mills D
Sci Technol Human Values. 2023; 49(1):78-104.
PMID: 38046188
PMC: 7615339.
DOI: 10.1177/01622439221112463.
Sever R
PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(10):e3002234.
PMID: 37788235
PMC: 10547197.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002234.
Mavrogenis A, Scarlat M
Int Orthop. 2023; 47(3):605-609.
PMID: 36749373
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05715-y.
Clase C, Dicks E, Holden R, Sood M, Levin A, Kalantar-Zadeh K
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022; 9:20543581221080327.
PMID: 35514878
PMC: 9067031.
DOI: 10.1177/20543581221080327.
A cross-sectional examination of conflict-of-interest disclosures of physician-authors publishing in high-impact US medical journals.
Baraldi J, Picozzo S, Arnold J, Volarich K, Gionfriddo M, Piper B
BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e057598.
PMID: 35410932
PMC: 9021780.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057598.
Highly cited forensic practitioners in the discipline legal and forensic medicine and the importance of peer-review and publication for admission of expert testimony.
Jones A
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022; 18(1):37-44.
PMID: 35129820
DOI: 10.1007/s12024-021-00447-0.
Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills.
Rivera H, Teixeira da Silva J
J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(24):e165.
PMID: 34155837
PMC: 8216989.
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e165.
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers.
Zimba O, Gasparyan A
Reumatologia. 2021; 59(1):3-8.
PMID: 33707789
PMC: 7944958.
DOI: 10.5114/reum.2021.102709.
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature.
Carneiro C, Queiroz V, Moulin T, Carvalho C, Haas C, Rayee D
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020; 5(1):16.
PMID: 33292815
PMC: 7706207.
DOI: 10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3.
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.
Hamilton D, Fraser H, Hoekstra R, Fidler F
Elife. 2020; 9.
PMID: 33211009
PMC: 7717900.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.62529.
Goodbye to all that.
Cohen A
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85(12):2645-2648.
PMID: 31828831
PMC: 6955395.
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14124.
The peer review system of Archives of Plastic Surgery: Current status and plans for improvement.
Chung K
Arch Plast Surg. 2019; 46(3):187-188.
PMID: 31113181
PMC: 6536878.
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2019.00528.
Independent Scientific Review under the Endangered Species Act.
Murphy D, Weiland P
Bioscience. 2019; 69(3):198-208.
PMID: 30899123
PMC: 6422828.
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biz001.
The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions.
Byrne J, Grima N, Capes-Davis A, Labbe C
Biomark Insights. 2019; 14:1177271919829162.
PMID: 30783377
PMC: 6366001.
DOI: 10.1177/1177271919829162.
Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils.
Rivera H
J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(2):e6.
PMID: 30636943
PMC: 6327091.
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e6.
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research.
Fong E, Wilhite A
PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0187394.
PMID: 29211744
PMC: 5718422.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187394.
Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times.
Sarigol E, Garcia D, Scholtes I, Schweitzer F
Scientometrics. 2017; 113(1):609-631.
PMID: 29056793
PMC: 5629258.
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2309-y.
The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal.
Teixeira da Silva J
Med J Armed Forces India. 2017; 73(2):181-183.
PMID: 28924321
PMC: 5592272.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008.
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?.
Teixeira da Silva J, Al-Khatib A
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017; 24(1):275-285.
PMID: 28155093
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9842-6.
