» Articles » PMID: 25427674

Self-Reported and Tested Function in Health Care Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders on Full, Partial or Not on Sick Leave

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Nov 28
PMID 25427674
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe self-reported and physically tested function in health care workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and to examine how function was associated with work participation.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. 250 health care workers attended an evaluation where self-reported and physical function were measured. Differences between groups (full sick leave, partial sick leave, not on sick leave/working) were analyzed for categorical data (Chi square exact test) and continuous variables (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests). Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine which factors were associated with being on sick leave.

Results: Participants on full sick leave had statistically significant poorer function compared to those working and the group on partial sick leave. Logistic regression showed that a reduced level of the physical dimension of SF-12 and a high lift test were significantly related to full sick leave (OR 0.86, p < 0.001) (OR 0.79, p = 0.002). The physical dimension of SF-12 was the only variable that was associated to partial sick leave (OR 0.91, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Health care workers on full sick leave due to MSDs have reduced function on self-reported and physically tested function, compared to those working despite MSDs, as well as when compared to those on partial sick leave. More knowledge about work ability in occupational sub-groups is needed.

References
1.
Osteras N, Brage S, Garratt A, Saltyte Benth J, Natvig B, Gulbrandsen P . Functional ability in a population: normative survey data and reliability for the ICF based Norwegian Function Assessment Scale. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7:278. PMC: 2222166. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-278. View

2.
Strand L, Ljunggren A, Haldorsen E, Espehaug B . The impact of physical function and pain on work status at 1-year follow-up in patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(7):800-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00022. View

3.
Biering-Sorensen F . Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984; 9(2):106-19. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198403000-00002. View

4.
Kvale A, Bunkan B, Opjordsmoen S, Friis S . Development of the movement domain in the global body examination. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011; 28(1):41-9. DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2011.561419. View

5.
Simmonds M, Olson S, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee C, Novy D . Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(22):2412-21. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199811150-00011. View