» Articles » PMID: 25418812

Effects of the KEEP Foster Parent Intervention on Child and Sibling Behavior Problems and Parental Stress During a Randomized Implementation Trial

Overview
Journal Prev Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2014 Nov 25
PMID 25418812
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children in foster care are at risk for externalizing behavior problems, which can in turn increase the risk of changes in foster care placement. The KEEP (Keeping Foster Parents Trained and Supported) foster parent training intervention was designed to equip foster parents with strategies for managing externalizing behavior problems. The primary goals of this investigation were to (a) examine the effectiveness of the KEEP intervention in reducing child behavior problems, as delivered by a community agency; (b) determine if the effects of the KEEP intervention generalize to more than one child in the same home; and (c) examine the effectiveness of the KEEP intervention in reducing parental stress associated with child behavior problems. The data from 335 foster and kinship families with children between the ages of 5 and 12 years were analyzed to address these objectives. Families were randomly assigned to the intervention or control condition. The results indicated that the KEEP intervention was effective in reducing child behavior problems when delivered by a community agency. These results expanded prior research on the KEEP intervention, revealing that the intervention was effective in reducing the behavior problems of more than one child in the same household and in reducing parental stress levels associated with the behavioral issues of the focal child. Thus, the KEEP intervention model holds promise for reducing the behavior problems of children in foster care and reducing stress levels of foster and kinship caregivers as it is disseminated and implemented within similar child welfare settings.

Citing Articles

Professional Quality of Life of Foster and Kinship Carers in Australia, United Kingdom, and the United States: A Scoping Review.

McLaren H, Patmisari E, Huang Y Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(3):2390-2406.

PMID: 38041424 PMC: 11155225. DOI: 10.1177/15248380231213322.


Exploring potential mental health spillover effects among caregivers and partners of youth in Sierra Leone: A qualitative study.

Desrosiers A, Schafer C, Bond L, Akinsulure-Smith A, Hinton M, Vandi A Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023; 10:e40.

PMID: 37854398 PMC: 10579673. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.36.


Interventions targeting the mental health and wellbeing of care-experienced children and young people in higher-income countries: Evidence map and systematic review.

Evans R, MacDonald S, Trubey R, Noyes J, Robling M, Willis S Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):111.

PMID: 37393358 PMC: 10315047. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02260-y.


An Integrative Data Analysis of Main and Moderated Crossover Effects of Parent-Mediated Interventions on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Youth in Foster Care.

Tiberio S, Pears K, Buchanan R, Chamberlain P, Leve L, Price J Prev Sci. 2023; 24(8):1547-1557.

PMID: 36930405 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01524-2.


Expect the Unexpected: A Qualitative Study of the Ripple Effects of Children's Mental Health Services Implementation Efforts.

Pullmann M, Dorsey S, Duong M, Lyon A, Muse I, Corbin C Implement Res Pract. 2022; 3.

PMID: 36504561 PMC: 9731268. DOI: 10.1177/26334895221120797.


References
1.
McClowry S, Snow D, Tamis-LeMonda C . An evaluation of the effects of INSIGHTS on the behavior of inner city primary school children. J Prim Prev. 2005; 26(6):567-84. PMC: 1425905. DOI: 10.1007/s10935-005-0015-7. View

2.
Brotman L, Dawson-McClure S, Kiely Gouley K, McGuire K, Burraston B, Bank L . Older siblings benefit from a family-based preventive intervention for preschoolers at risk for conduct problems. J Fam Psychol. 2006; 19(4):581-91. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.4.581. View

3.
Chamberlain P, Moreland S, Reid K . Enhanced services and stipends for foster parents: effects on retention rates and outcomes for children. Child Welfare. 1992; 71(5):387-401. View

4.
Chamberlain P, Price J, Reid J, Landsverk J, Fisher P, Stoolmiller M . Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care?. Child Abuse Negl. 2006; 30(4):409-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004. View

5.
Newton R, Litrownik A, Landsverk J . Children and youth in foster care: distangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements. Child Abuse Negl. 2000; 24(10):1363-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00189-7. View