» Articles » PMID: 25408082

Predicting Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Readmission After Cardiac Surgery: Derivation and Validation of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit Clinical...

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2014 Nov 20
PMID 25408082
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In medical and surgical intensive care units, clinical risk prediction models for readmission have been developed; however, studies reporting the risks for cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) readmission have been methodologically limited by small numbers of outcomes, unreported measures of calibration or discrimination, or a lack of information spanning the entire perioperative period. The purpose of this study was to derive and validate a clinical prediction model for CVICU readmission in cardiac surgical patients.

Methods: A total of 10,799 patients more than or equal to 18 years in the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry who underwent cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass or valvular surgery) between 2004 and 2012 and were discharged alive from the first CVICU admission were included. The full cohort was used to derive the clinical prediction model and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the AUC c index and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, respectively.

Results: A total of 479 (4.4%) patients required CVICU readmission. The mean CVICU length of stay (19.9 versus 3.3 days, P <0.001) and in-hospital mortality (14.4% versus 2.2%, P <0.001) were higher among patients readmitted to the CVICU. In the derivation cohort, a total of three preoperative (age ≥ 70, ejection fraction, chronic lung disease), two intraoperative (single valve repair or replacement plus non-CABG surgery, multivalve repair or replacement), and seven postoperative variables (cardiac arrest, pneumonia, pleural effusion, deep sternal wound infection, leg graft harvest site infection, gastrointestinal bleed, neurologic complications) were independently associated with CVICU readmission. The clinical prediction model had robust discrimination and calibration in the derivation cohort (AUC c index = 0.799; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.192). The validation point estimates and confidence intervals were similar to derivation model.

Conclusions: In a large population-based dataset incorporating a comprehensive set of perioperative variables, we have derived a clinical prediction model with excellent discrimination and calibration. This model identifies opportunities for targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing CVICU readmissions in high-risk patients.

Citing Articles

Prediction model of ICU readmission in Chinese patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study.

Ni H, Peng Y, Pan Q, Gao Z, Li S, Chen L BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):358.

PMID: 39593004 PMC: 11600566. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02770-2.


Exposure to the non-phthalate plasticizer di-heptyl succinate is less disruptive to C57bl/6N mouse recovery from a myocardial infarction than DEHP, TOTM or related di-octyl succinate.

Schwendt A, Chammas J, Maric M, Nicell J, Leask R, Chalifour L PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288491.

PMID: 37440506 PMC: 10343165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288491.


Predictive Modeling for Readmission to Intensive Care: A Systematic Review.

Ruppert M, Loftus T, Small C, Li H, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Balch J Crit Care Explor. 2023; 5(1):e0848.

PMID: 36699252 PMC: 9829260. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000848.


A 3-hour fast-track extubation protocol for early extubation after cardiac surgery.

Helwani M, Copeland C, Ridley C, Kaiser H, Wet C JTCVS Open. 2023; 12:299-305.

PMID: 36590715 PMC: 9801240. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.006.


N-Terminal of the Prohormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide Predicts Postoperative Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Duchnowski P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36233362 PMC: 9570867. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195493.


References
1.
Norris C, Ghali W, Knudtson M, Naylor C, Saunders L . Dealing with missing data in observational health care outcome analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(4):377-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00181-x. View

2.
Niven D, Bastos J, Stelfox H . Critical care transition programs and the risk of readmission or death after discharge from an ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013; 42(1):179-87. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a272c0. View

3.
Rosenberg A, Hofer T, Hayward R, Strachan C, Watts C . Who bounces back? Physiologic and other predictors of intensive care unit readmission. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(3):511-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00008. View

4.
Pottle A, Bullock I, Thomas J, Scott L . Survival to discharge following open chest cardiac compression (OCCC). A 4-year retrospective audit in a cardiothoracic specialist centre--Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Resuscitation. 2002; 52(3):269-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00479-8. View

5.
Chung D, Sharples L, Nashef S . A case-control analysis of readmissions to the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 22(2):282-6. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00303-2. View