Measuring Value in Primary Care: Enhancing Quality or Checking the Box?
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Paying for what matters most: the future of outcomes-based payments in healthcare.
Dunbar-Rees R Future Healthc J. 2019; 5(2):98-102.
PMID: 31098542 PMC: 6502565. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-98.
References
1.
McMahon Jr L, Hayward R, Saint S, Chernew M, Fendrick A
. Univariate solutions in a multivariate world: can we afford to practice as in the "good old days"?. Am J Manag Care. 2005; 11(8):473-6.
View
2.
Kerr E, Krein S, Vijan S, Hofer T, Hayward R
. Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: a case for the next generation of technical quality measures. Am J Manag Care. 2001; 7(11):1033-43.
View
3.
Kerr E, Smith D, Hogan M, Hofer T, Krein S, Bermann M
. Building a better quality measure: are some patients with 'poor quality' actually getting good care?. Med Care. 2003; 41(10):1173-82.
DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000088453.57269.29.
View
4.
Vijan S, Hofer T, Hayward R
. Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 127(9):788-95.
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00003.
View
5.
Hofer T, Hayward R, Greenfield S, Wagner E, Kaplan S, Manning W
. The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA. 1999; 281(22):2098-105.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2098.
View