» Articles » PMID: 25404135

Accurate Ab Initio Prediction of NMR Chemical Shifts of Nucleic Acids and Nucleic Acids/protein Complexes

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2014 Nov 19
PMID 25404135
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

NMR chemical shift predictions based on empirical methods are nowadays indispensable tools during resonance assignment and 3D structure calculation of proteins. However, owing to the very limited statistical data basis, such methods are still in their infancy in the field of nucleic acids, especially when non-canonical structures and nucleic acid complexes are considered. Here, we present an ab initio approach for predicting proton chemical shifts of arbitrary nucleic acid structures based on state-of-the-art fragment-based quantum chemical calculations. We tested our prediction method on a diverse set of nucleic acid structures including double-stranded DNA, hairpins, DNA/protein complexes and chemically-modified DNA. Overall, our quantum chemical calculations yield highly/very accurate predictions with mean absolute deviations of 0.3-0.6 ppm and correlation coefficients (r(2)) usually above 0.9. This will allow for identifying misassignments and validating 3D structures. Furthermore, our calculations reveal that chemical shifts of protons involved in hydrogen bonding are predicted significantly less accurately. This is in part caused by insufficient inclusion of solvation effects. However, it also points toward shortcomings of current force fields used for structure determination of nucleic acids. Our quantum chemical calculations could therefore provide input for force field optimization.

Citing Articles

DELTA50: A Highly Accurate Database of Experimental H and C NMR Chemical Shifts Applied to DFT Benchmarking.

Cohen R, Wood J, Lam Y, Buevich A, Sherer E, Reibarkh M Molecules. 2023; 28(6).

PMID: 36985422 PMC: 10051451. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062449.


Self-Consistent Parameterization of DNA Residues for the Non-Polarizable AMBER Force Fields.

Schneider A, Albrecht A, Huang K, Germann M, Poon G Life (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35629334 PMC: 9143812. DOI: 10.3390/life12050666.


Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Nerli S, McShan A, Sgourakis N Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2019; 106-107:1-25.

PMID: 31047599 PMC: 6788782. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.03.002.


Automated Fragmentation QM/MM Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts for Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Jin X, Zhu T, Zhang J, He X Front Chem. 2018; 6:150.

PMID: 29868556 PMC: 5952040. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00150.


AFNMR: automated fragmentation quantum mechanical calculation of NMR chemical shifts for biomolecules.

Swails J, Zhu T, He X, Case D J Biomol NMR. 2015; 63(2):125-39.

PMID: 26232926 PMC: 6556433. DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9970-3.

References
1.
Lam S . DSHIFT: a web server for predicting DNA chemical shifts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(Web Server issue):W713-7. PMC: 1933157. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm320. View

2.
Kalodimos C, Bonvin A, Salinas R, Wechselberger R, Boelens R, Kaptein R . Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain. EMBO J. 2002; 21(12):2866-76. PMC: 126071. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf318. View

3.
Vila J, Scheraga H . Factors affecting the use of 13C(alpha) chemical shifts to determine, refine, and validate protein structures. Proteins. 2007; 71(2):641-54. PMC: 2490732. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21726. View

4.
Frank A, Moller H, Exner T . Toward the Quantum Chemical Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts of Proteins. 2. Level of Theory, Basis Set, and Solvents Model Dependence. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015; 8(4):1480-92. DOI: 10.1021/ct200913r. View

5.
Schroeder K, Skalicky J, Greenbaum N . NMR spectroscopy of RNA duplexes containing pseudouridine in supercooled water. RNA. 2005; 11(7):1012-6. PMC: 1370786. DOI: 10.1261/rna.2270205. View