» Articles » PMID: 25398623

Exploring the Response Shift Effect on the Quality of Life of Patients with Schizophrenia: an Application of the Random Forest Method

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2014 Nov 16
PMID 25398623
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interpretation of quality of life (QoL) scores over time can be difficult because of possible changes in internal standards, values, and conceptualization of QoL by individuals. This effect is called a response shift (RS). The purpose of this study was to examine whether an RS effect occurred over a 24-mo period in patients who were suffering from schizophrenia.

Methods: The random forest method was applied to detect any RS reprioritization in a multicenter cohort study. QoL was recorded using a generic questionnaire (SF36) at baseline (T0), 12 mo (T12), and 24 mo (T24). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on psychotic symptoms and relapse (stable, improved, and worsened groups) from their clinical profiles. The random forest method was performed to predict the General Health score of the SF36 from the other QoL domain scores of the SF36. We estimated the average variable importance of the QoL domain for each of the 3 groups.

Results: A total of 124 (53.2%) patients were defined as stable, 59 (25.3%) as improved, and 50 (21.5%) as worsened. Among the stable group, the Social Functioning domain became more important over time. Of those classified as improved, the Mental Health domain became more important over time, while the Vitality domain became less important. Among those in the group who worsened, the Mental Health domain became less important while the Vitality and Bodily Pain domains became more important.

Conclusions: Our study identified differential RS reprioritization among patients with different clinical profiles. Further work is needed to determine whether RS should be interpreted as a measurement bias or as an effect integrated in a true change.

Citing Articles

Implications of the syntheses on definition, theory, and methods conducted by the Response Shift - in Sync Working Group.

Sprangers M, Sawatzky R, Vanier A, Bohnke J, Sajobi T, Mayo N Qual Life Res. 2023; 32(8):2165-2178.

PMID: 36757572 PMC: 10329073. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03347-8.


Housing First for homeless people with severe mental illness: extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of recovery and housing stability from the randomized trial.

Loubiere S, Lemoine C, Boucekine M, Boyer L, Girard V, Tinland A Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022; 31:e14.

PMID: 35125129 PMC: 8851060. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796022000026.


If it's information, it's not "bias": a scoping review and proposed nomenclature for future response-shift research.

Schwartz C, Rohde G, Biletch E, Stuart R, Huang I, Lipscomb J Qual Life Res. 2021; 31(8):2247-2257.

PMID: 34705159 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03023-9.


Quality of life of transplanted children and their parents: a cross-sectional study.

Duvant P, Fillat M, Garaix F, Roquelaure B, Ovaert C, Fouilloux V Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021; 16(1):364.

PMID: 34404428 PMC: 8369793. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01987-y.


Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods.

Sebille V, Lix L, Ayilara O, Sajobi T, Janssens A, Sawatzky R Qual Life Res. 2021; 30(12):3325-3342.

PMID: 33595827 PMC: 8602164. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02755-4.