» Articles » PMID: 25395696

How Similar Are Cohabiting and Married Parents? Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across Europe

Overview
Journal Eur J Popul
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Nov 15
PMID 25395696
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The increase in births within cohabitation in the United States and across Europe suggests that cohabitation and marriage have become more similar with respect to childbearing. However, little is known about additional childbearing after first birth. Using harmonized union and fertility histories from surveys in 15 countries, this study examines second conception risks leading to a live birth for women who have given birth within a union. Results show that women who continue to cohabit after birth have significantly lower second conception risks than married women in all countries except those in Eastern Europe, even when controlling for union duration, union dissolution, age at first birth, and education. Pooled models indicate that differences in the second conception risks by union type between Eastern and Western Europe are significant. Pooled models including an indicator for the diffusion of cohabitation show that when first births within cohabitation are rare, cohabiting women have significantly lower second conception risks than married women. As first births within cohabitation increase, differences in second conception risks for cohabiting and married women narrow. But as the percent increases further, the differentials increase again, suggesting that cohabitation and marriage are not becoming equivalent settings for additional childbearing. However, I also find that in all countries except Estonia, women who marry after first birth have second conception risks similar to couples married at first birth, indicating that the sequence of marriage and childbearing does not matter to fertility as much as the act of marrying itself.

Citing Articles

Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation.

Vitali A, Fraboni R Eur J Popul. 2022; 38(4):721-754.

PMID: 36237296 PMC: 9550889. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2.


Family Change in Global Perspective: How and Why Family Systems Change.

Furstenberg F Fam Relat. 2021; 68(3):326-341.

PMID: 34305222 PMC: 8298013. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12361.


Mind the "Happiness" Gap: The Relationship Between Cohabitation, Marriage, and Subjective Well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway.

Perelli-Harris B, Hoherz S, Lappegard T, Evans A Demography. 2019; 56(4):1219-1246.

PMID: 31290087 PMC: 6667403. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00792-4.


The Effect of Prenatal Stress, Proxied by Marital and Paternity Status, on the Risk of Preterm Birth.

Merklinger-Gruchala A, Kapiszewska M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(2).

PMID: 30669349 PMC: 6352213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16020273.


Partnership Choice and Childbearing in Norway and Spain.

Rutigliano R, Esping-Andersen G Eur J Popul. 2018; 34(3):367-386.

PMID: 30147208 PMC: 6096890. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-017-9432-6.


References
1.
Kenney C, McLanahan S . Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages?. Demography. 2006; 43(1):127-40. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2006.0007. View

2.
Steele F, Kallis C, Goldstein H, Joshi H . The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography. 2006; 42(4):647-73. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2005.0038. View

3.
Kennedy S, Bumpass L . Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demogr Res. 2009; 19:1663-1692. PMC: 2612998. DOI: 10.4054/demres.2008.19.47. View

4.
Liefbroer A, Dourleijn E . Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography. 2006; 43(2):203-21. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2006.0018. View

5.
Raley R . Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States?. Demography. 2001; 38(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2001.0008. View