» Articles » PMID: 25394778

Clinicopathological Analysis of Endometrial Carcinomas Harboring Somatic POLE Exonuclease Domain Mutations

Overview
Journal Mod Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2014 Nov 15
PMID 25394778
Citations 83
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas described four major genomic groups of endometrial carcinomas, including a POLE ultramutated subtype comprising ∼10% of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, characterized by POLE exonuclease domain mutations, ultrahigh somatic mutation rates, and favorable outcome. Our aim was to examine the morphological and clinicopathological features of ultramutated endometrial carcinomas harboring somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations. Hematoxylin and eosin slides and pathology reports for 8/17 POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas described in the Cancer Genome Atlas study were studied; for the remaining cases, virtual whole slide images publicly available at cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org) were examined. A second cohort of eight POLE mutated endometrial carcinomas from University of Calgary was also studied. Median age was 55 years (range 33-87 years). Nineteen patients presented as stage I, 1 stage II, and 5 stage III. The majority of cases (24 of the 25) demonstrated defining morphological features of endometrioid differentiation. The studied cases were frequently high grade (60%) and rich in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and/or peri-tumoral lymphocytes (84%); many tumors showed morphological heterogeneity (52%) and ambiguity (16%). Foci demonstrating severe nuclear atypia led to concern for serous carcinoma in 28% of cases. At the molecular level, the majority of the Cancer Genome Atlas POLE-mutated tumors were microsatellite stable (65%), and TP53 mutations were present in 35% of cases. They also harbored mutations in PTEN (94%), FBXW7 (82%), ARID1A (76%), and PIK3CA (71%). All patients from both cohorts were alive without disease, and none of the patients developed recurrence at the time of follow-up (median 33 months; range 2-102 months). In conclusion, the recognition of ultramutated endometrial carcinomas with POLE exonuclease domain mutation is important given their favorable outcome. Our histopathological review revealed that these tumors are commonly high grade, have obvious lymphocytic infiltrates, and can show ambiguous morphology. As they frequently harbor TP53 mutations, it is important not to misclassify them as serous carcinoma.

Citing Articles

Integrated Analysis of Polymerase Family Gene Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Features, Prognosis, and Bioinformatics Insights.

Wu J, Wang C, Tang W, Gao J, Guo X Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768855 PMC: 11676477. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121975.


Safety and Efficacy of Brachytherapy in Inoperable Endometrial Cancer.

Merten R, Strnad V, Schweizer C, Lotter M, Kreppner S, Fietkau R J Pers Med. 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728051 PMC: 11676033. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14121138.


The game-changing impact of mutations in oncology-a review from a gynecologic oncology perspective.

Kogl J, Pan T, Marth C, Zeimet A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1369189.

PMID: 39239272 PMC: 11374733. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1369189.


Morphomolecular Correlation and Clinicopathologic Analysis in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Bulbul G, Aktas T, Aysal Agalar A, Aktas S, Kurt S, Saatli B Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2024; 43(6):535-556.

PMID: 39024461 PMC: 11485203. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000001013.


Uncommon Morphologic Types of Endometrial Cancer and Their Mimickers: How Much Does Molecular Classification Improve the Practice for Challenging Cases?.

Saglam O Life (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38541711 PMC: 10971728. DOI: 10.3390/life14030387.


References
1.
Hoang L, McConechy M, Kobel M, Han G, Rouzbahman M, Davidson B . Histotype-genotype correlation in 36 high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37(9):1421-32. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31828c63ed. View

2.
Zhao S, Choi M, Overton J, Bellone S, Roque D, Cocco E . Landscape of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number mutations in uterine serous carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(8):2916-21. PMC: 3581983. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222577110. View

3.
Mei Z, Liu Y, Liu C, Cui A, Liang Z, Wang G . Tumour-infiltrating inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(6):1595-605. PMC: 3960618. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.46. View

4.
Nick McElhinny S, Gordenin D, Stith C, Burgers P, Kunkel T . Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol Cell. 2008; 30(2):137-44. PMC: 2654179. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.022. View

5.
Murali R, Soslow R, Weigelt B . Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(7):e268-78. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70591-6. View