» Articles » PMID: 25394589

Technique Evolution, Learning Curve, and Outcomes of 200 Robot-assisted Gastric Bypass Procedures: a 5-year Experience

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2014 Nov 15
PMID 25394589
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We evaluate our 5-year experience, evolution of technique, and clinical outcomes with robot-assisted RYGB.

Methods: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted RYGB at our center were included. Among them, 118 patients underwent a hybrid robot-assisted laparoscopic RYGB (LRRYGB), and 82 patients underwent a totally robotic RYGB (TRRYGB). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, operative parameters, conversions, morbidity, mortality, and excess weight loss were analyzed.

Results: Most of the patients (88 %) were female with a mean age of 41.9 years and mean BMI of 46.6 kg/m(2). The outcomes of patients who underwent LRRYGB (n = 118) were compared to those who underwent TRRYGB (n = 82). The mean operative time in TRRYGB group was 170.9 ± 51.4 min which was significantly lower than LRRYGB group (216 ± 54.1 min). The mean operative time for the last 100 patients was significantly lower than that for the first 100 patients. The excess weight loss (EWL) was 58.3 % at 6 months, 67.7 % at 1 year, 71.6 % at 2 years, and 65 % at 3 years. There were three conversions to open, three reoperations and four readmissions. There were no anastomotic leak, major bleed, gastrojejunostomy stricture, or mortality seen in our series.

Conclusions: Use of robot assistance to perform RYGB is safe and may reduce the associated complications, namely, anastomotic leak, gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture, and hemorrhage. Excess weight loss at 2 years after RRYGB is comparable to laparoscopic RYGB.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review to Summarise and Appraise the Reporting of Surgical Innovation: a Case Study in Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Huttman M, Smith A, Robertson H, Purves R, Biggs S, Dewi F Obes Surg. 2024; 34(8):3058-3070.

PMID: 38898310 PMC: 11289006. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07329-8.


Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 527 Consecutive Patients.

Bedirli A, Yavuz A, Dikmen K, Buyukkasap C, Ozaydin S JSLS. 2022; 26(1).

PMID: 35444400 PMC: 8993462. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072.


Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery.

Soomro N, Hashimoto D, Porteous A, Ridley C, Marsh W, Ditto R BJS Open. 2020; 4(1):27-44.

PMID: 32011823 PMC: 6996634. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50235.


Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Metabolic Surgery in a Multiethnic Sample of 1012 Patients.

Masrur M, Bustos R, Sanchez-Johnsen L, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli L, Mangano A, Gonzalez-Heredia R Obes Surg. 2019; 30(3):975-981.

PMID: 31848986 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04338-w.


Robotic-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Learning Curve Assessment Using Cumulative Sum and Literature Review.

Bustos R, Mangano A, Gheza F, Chen L, Aguiluz-Cornejo G, Gangemi A Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2019; 14(3):95-101.

PMID: 31572625 PMC: 6763956. DOI: 10.1089/bari.2018.0042.


References
1.
Wilson E, Sudan R . The evolution of robotic bariatric surgery. World J Surg. 2013; 37(12):2756-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2125-3. View

2.
Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, Wilson T, Toder M, Wilson E . Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; 9(2):284-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.11.022. View

3.
Buchwald H, Williams S . Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004; 14(9):1157-64. DOI: 10.1381/0960892042387057. View

4.
Hagen M, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P . Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011; 22(1):52-61. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0422-1. View

5.
Buchs N, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen M, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P . Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011; 26(4):1116-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2008-3. View