» Articles » PMID: 25390941

Hyperbolic Discounting: Value and Time Processes of Substance Abusers and Non-clinical Individuals in Intertemporal Choice

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Nov 13
PMID 25390941
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The single parameter hyperbolic model has been frequently used to describe value discounting as a function of time and to differentiate substance abusers and non-clinical participants with the model's parameter k. However, k says little about the mechanisms underlying the observed differences. The present study evaluates several alternative models with the purpose of identifying whether group differences stem from differences in subjective valuation, and/or time perceptions. Using three two-parameter models, plus secondary data analyses of 14 studies with 471 indifference point curves, results demonstrated that adding a valuation, or a time perception function led to better model fits. However, the gain in fit due to the flexibility granted by a second parameter did not always lead to a better understanding of the data patterns and corresponding psychological processes. The k parameter consistently indexed group and context (magnitude) differences; it is thus a mixed measure of person and task level effects. This was similar for a parameter meant to index payoff devaluation. A time perception parameter, on the other hand, fluctuated with contexts in a non-predicted fashion and the interpretation of its values was inconsistent with prior findings that supported enlarged perceived delays for substance abusers compared to controls. Overall, the results provide mixed support for hyperbolic models of intertemporal choice in terms of the psychological meaning afforded by their parameters.

Citing Articles

Measuring Impatience in Intertemporal Choice.

Cruz Rambaud S, Munoz Torrecillas M PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0149256.

PMID: 26890895 PMC: 4758727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149256.

References
1.
Odum A, Madden G, Badger G, Bickel W . Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 60(3):259-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00111-3. View

2.
Sidman M . A note on functional relations obtained from group data. Psychol Bull. 1952; 49(3):263-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0063643. View

3.
Takahashi T . A neuroeconomic theory of rational addiction and nonlinear time-perception. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011; 32(3):221-5. View

4.
de Wit H . Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2008; 14(1):22-31. PMC: 3640851. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x. View

5.
Chabris C, Laibson D, Morris C, Schuldt J, Taubinsky D . Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. J Risk Uncertain. 2009; 37(2-3):237-269. PMC: 2676104. DOI: 10.1007/s11166-008-9053-x. View