» Articles » PMID: 25389105

Modern Reproductive Patterns Associated with Estrogen Receptor Positive but Not Negative Breast Cancer Susceptibility

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Nov 13
PMID 25389105
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has long been accepted that modern reproductive patterns are likely contributors to breast cancer susceptibility because of their influence on hormones such as estrogen and the importance of these hormones in breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess whether this 'evolutionary mismatch hypothesis' can explain susceptibility to both estrogen receptor positive (ER-positive) and estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) cancer. Our meta-analysis includes a total of 33 studies and examines parity, age of first birth and age of menarche broken down by estrogen receptor status. We found that modern reproductive patterns are more closely linked to ER-positive than ER-negative breast cancer. Thus, the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis for breast cancer can account for ER-positive breast cancer susceptibility but not ER-negative breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity: A scoping review of the literature.

Hurson A, Ahearn T, Koka H, Jenkins B, Harris A, Roberts S medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39108508 PMC: 11302715. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.18.24304210.


Risk factors for breast cancer subtypes by race and ethnicity: a scoping review.

Hurson A, Ahearn T, Koka H, Jenkins B, Harris A, Roberts S J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024; 116(12):1992-2002.

PMID: 39018167 PMC: 11630539. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae172.


Cancer hygiene hypothesis: A test from wild captive mammals.

Dujon A, Jeanjean J, Vincze O, Giraudeau M, Lemaitre J, Pujol P Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(9):e10547.

PMID: 37745791 PMC: 10515881. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10547.


Reproductive history and breast cancer survival: Findings from the African breast cancer-Disparities in outcomes cohort and implications of Africa's fertility transition on breast cancer prognosis.

Boucheron P, Anele A, Offiah A, Zietsman A, Galukande M, Parham G Int J Cancer. 2022; 152(9):1804-1816.

PMID: 36545890 PMC: 10070810. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34411.


Early life adversity, reproductive history and breast cancer risk.

Boddy A, Rupp S, Yu Z, Hanson H, Aktipis A, Smith K Evol Med Public Health. 2022; 10(1):429-438.

PMID: 36101671 PMC: 9464099. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoac034.


References
1.
Gaudet M, Press M, Haile R, Lynch C, Glaser S, Schildkraut J . Risk factors by molecular subtypes of breast cancer across a population-based study of women 56 years or younger. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 130(2):587-97. PMC: 3721192. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1616-x. View

2.
Champagne F . Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Dev Psychobiol. 2010; 52(4):299-311. DOI: 10.1002/dev.20436. View

3.
Rusiecki J, Holford T, Zahm S, Zheng T . Breast cancer risk factors according to joint estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005; 29(5):419-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.07.004. View

4.
Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, Erven V, Wappenschmidt B, Niederacher D . Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(5):410-4. DOI: 10.1038/ng.569. View

5.
Stefansson O, Jonasson J, Olafsdottir K, Hilmarsdottir H, Olafsdottir G, Esteller M . CpG island hypermethylation of BRCA1 and loss of pRb as co-occurring events in basal/triple-negative breast cancer. Epigenetics. 2011; 6(5):638-49. PMC: 3121973. DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15667. View