» Articles » PMID: 25384653

Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among Infants of Immigrant Women According to Birth-weight Curves Tailored to Maternal World Region of Origin

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2014 Nov 12
PMID 25384653
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Infants of immigrant women in Western nations generally have lower birth weights than infants of native-born women. Whether this difference is physiologic or pathological is unclear. We determined whether the use of birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin would discriminate adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes more accurately than a single birth-weight curve based on infants of Canadian-born women.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of in-hospital singleton live births (328,387 to immigrant women, 761,260 to nonimmigrant women) in Ontario between 2002 and 2012 using population health services data linked to the national immigration database. We classified infants as small for gestational age (<10th percentile) or large for gestational age (≥90th percentile) using both Canadian and world region-specific birth-weight curves and compared associations with adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes.

Results: Compared with world region-specific birth-weight curves, the Canadian curve classified 20 431 (6.2%) additional newborns of immigrant women as small for gestational age, of whom 15,467 (75.7%) were of East or South Asian descent. The odds of neonatal death were lower among small-for-gestational-age infants of immigrant women than among those of nonimmigrant women based on the Canadian birth-weight curve (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.95), but higher when small for gestational age was defined by the world region-specific curves (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42). Conversely, the odds of some adverse outcomes were lower among large-for-gestational-age infants of immigrant women than among those of nonimmigrant women based on world region-specific birth-weight curves, but were similar based on the Canadian curve.

Interpretation: World region-specific birth-weight curves seemed to be more appropriate than a single Canadian population-based curve for assessing the risk of adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes among small- and large-for-gestational-age infants born to immigrant women, especially those from the East and South Asian regions.

Citing Articles

Birth and postnatal outcomes among infants of immigrant parents of different admission categories and parents born in Canada: a population-based retrospective study.

Yang S, Shapiro G, Ng E, Vissandjee B, Vang Z CMAJ. 2024; 196(12):E394-E409.

PMID: 38565234 PMC: 10984700. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230878.


Synergic effects of PM and thermal inversion on the incidence of small for gestational age infants: a weekly-based assessment.

Zhang X, Zhang F, Gao Y, Zhong Y, Zhang Y, Zhao G J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023; 33(4):652-662.

PMID: 37019981 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-023-00542-0.


Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and International Immigration Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Behboudi-Gandevani S, Bidhendi-Yarandi R, Panahi M, Mardani A, Paal P, Prinds C Ann Glob Health. 2022; 88(1):44.

PMID: 35854922 PMC: 9248985. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3591.


Birth Outcomes among Descendants of Foreign-Born and US-Born Women in California: Variation by Race and Ethnicity.

Andrasfay T J Immigr Minor Health. 2021; 24(3):605-613.

PMID: 34075511 PMC: 8633185. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-021-01221-8.


Country of first birth and neonatal outcomes in migrant and Norwegian-born parous women in Norway: a population-based study.

Vik E, Nilsen R, Aasheim V, Small R, Moster D, Schytt E BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):540.

PMID: 32539855 PMC: 7296964. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05415-y.


References
1.
Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S . Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG. 2001; 108(8):830-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00205.x. View

2.
Hutcheon J . Do customized birth weight charts add anything but complexity to the assessment of fetal growth?. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36(2):107-109. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30652-6. View

3.
DeLong E, Delong D, Clarke-Pearson D . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44(3):837-45. View

4.
Singer L, Salvator A, Guo S, Collin M, Lilien L, Baley J . Maternal psychological distress and parenting stress after the birth of a very low-birth-weight infant. JAMA. 1999; 281(9):799-805. PMC: 10189739. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.9.799. View

5.
Alexander G, Kogan M, Himes J, Mor J, Goldenberg R . Racial differences in birthweight for gestational age and infant mortality in extremely-low-risk US populations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999; 13(2):205-17. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00174.x. View