» Articles » PMID: 25381009

Belief in and Use of Complementary Therapies Among Family Physicians, Internists and Orthopaedists in Germany - Cross-sectional Survey

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Nov 9
PMID 25381009
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared the belief in and the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) across different medical specialties.

Objective: To investigate to what extent family physicians, internists and orthopaedists working in private practice in Germany (i) belief in the efficacy of CAM therapies; (ii) use these therapies for treating patients and (iii) whether beliefs and use are associated with basic professional attitudes.

Methods: A four-page questionnaire was sent to nation-wide random samples of the three groups of physicians. Participants were asked to indicate their belief in the efficacy and their use of seven CAM treatments and to rate their agreement to statements on orthodox and heterodox professional views, patient-provider relationship and placebo effects.

Results: A total of 935 of 2018 (46%) physicians contacted sent back a questionnaire. The belief in specific effects of CAM therapies varied strongly within and between specialties, but overall many physicians hold positive views. Internists were more skeptic than family physicians and orthopaedists (P < 0.001); 23% of family physicians, 6% of internists and 31% of orthopaedists reported to use four or more CAM therapies more often than once a week. Frequent CAM use was strongly associated with being an orthopaedist and a higher overall belief in CAM modalities. Holding orthodox professional views predicted low CAM use.

Conclusions: Many physicians (particularly, family physicians and orthopaedists) working in private practice in Germany use CAM therapies frequently and believe in their efficacy. Professional views and the specific working situation seem to influence use and believe strongly.

Citing Articles

How does the role of complementary and alternative medicine in general practice differ between countries? Interviews with doctors who have worked both in Germany and elsewhere in Europe.

Linde K, Bayer R, Gehrmann J, Jansky B BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024; 24(1):328.

PMID: 39227930 PMC: 11373194. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04624-w.


Attitude, knowledge, and barriers of Chinese clinical and nursing students in implementing complementary and alternative medicine for COVID-19:a cross-sectional study.

Xie H, Zhou Y, Li M, Chen Z, Zheng Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e30915.

PMID: 38778948 PMC: 11108821. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30915.


German translation and validation of the complementary and alternative medicine health belief questionnaire (CHBQ).

Hinse M, Jerzynski L, Binting S, Kummer S, Brinkhaus B, Rotter G BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):99.

PMID: 38291405 PMC: 10829264. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04985-9.


Endorsement of alternative medicine and vaccine hesitancy among physicians: A cross-sectional study in four European countries.

Fasce A, Karlsson L, Verger P, Maki O, Taubert F, Garrison A Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023; 19(2):2242748.

PMID: 37581343 PMC: 10431744. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2242748.


[Effects of the Risk of Recourse Claims on the Work of General Practitioners and Orthopedists - A Nationwide Survey].

Ribbat L, Linde K, Schneider A, Riedl B Gesundheitswesen. 2021; 85(2):111-118.

PMID: 34587633 PMC: 11248971. DOI: 10.1055/a-1594-2527.