» Articles » PMID: 25379899

Automatic Background Knowledge Selection for Matching Biomedical Ontologies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Nov 8
PMID 25379899
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ontology matching is a growing field of research that is of critical importance for the semantic web initiative. The use of background knowledge for ontology matching is often a key factor for success, particularly in complex and lexically rich domains such as the life sciences. However, in most ontology matching systems, the background knowledge sources are either predefined by the system or have to be provided by the user. In this paper, we present a novel methodology for automatically selecting background knowledge sources for any given ontologies to match. This methodology measures the usefulness of each background knowledge source by assessing the fraction of classes mapped through it over those mapped directly, which we call the mapping gain. We implemented this methodology in the AgreementMakerLight ontology matching framework, and evaluate it using the benchmark biomedical ontology matching tasks from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2013. In each matching problem, our methodology consistently identified the sources of background knowledge that led to the highest improvements over the baseline alignment (i.e., without background knowledge). Furthermore, our proposed mapping gain parameter is strongly correlated with the F-measure of the produced alignments, thus making it a good estimator for ontology matching techniques based on background knowledge.

Citing Articles

Matching Biomedical Ontologies: Construction of Matching Clues and Systematic Evaluation of Different Combinations of Matchers.

Wang P, Hu Y, Bai S, Zou S JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9(8):e28212.

PMID: 34420930 PMC: 8414291. DOI: 10.2196/28212.


Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies.

Faria D, Pesquita C, Mott I, Martins C, Couto F, Cruz I J Biomed Semantics. 2018; 9(1):4.

PMID: 29335022 PMC: 5769431. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-017-0170-9.


Improving the interoperability of biomedical ontologies with compound alignments.

Oliveira D, Pesquita C J Biomed Semantics. 2018; 9(1):1.

PMID: 29316968 PMC: 5761129. DOI: 10.1186/s13326-017-0171-8.

References
1.
Kirsten T, Gross A, Hartung M, Rahm E . GOMMA: a component-based infrastructure for managing and analyzing life science ontologies and their evolution. J Biomed Semantics. 2011; 2:6. PMC: 3198872. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-2-6. View

2.
Bodenreider O . The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 32(Database issue):D267-70. PMC: 308795. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh061. View

3.
Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W . The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25(11):1251-5. PMC: 2814061. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1346. View

4.
Bodenreider O, Stevens R . Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions. Brief Bioinform. 2006; 7(3):256-74. PMC: 1847325. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbl027. View

5.
Noy N, Shah N, Whetzel P, Dai B, Dorf M, Griffith N . BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(Web Server issue):W170-3. PMC: 2703982. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp440. View