» Articles » PMID: 25366656

Evaluating the Validity of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Exception Points for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Multiple Nodules <2 cm

Overview
Journal Clin Transplant
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2014 Nov 5
PMID 25366656
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Liver transplant allocation policy does not give model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception points for patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) <2 cm in size, but does give points to patients with multiple small nodules. Because standard-of-care imaging for HCC struggles to differentiate HCC from other nodules, it is possible that a subset of patients receiving liver transplant for multiple nodules <2 cm in size does not have HCC. We evaluate risk of post-transplant HCC recurrence and wait-list dropout for patients with multiple small nodules using competing risks regression based on the Fine and Gray model. We identified 5002 adult HCC patients in the OPTN/UNOS dataset diagnosed and transplanted between January 2006 and September 2010. Compared to patients with >1 tumor <2 cm, risk of developing recurrence was significantly higher in patients with one or more tumors with only one tumor ≥2 cm (SHR 1.63, p = 0.009), as well as in patients with 2-3 tumors ≥2 cm (SHR 1.84, p = 0.02). Dropout risk was not significantly different among size categories. HCC recurrence risk was significantly lower in patients with multiple nodules <2 cm in size than in those with larger tumors, supporting the possibility that some patients received unnecessary transplants. The priority given to these patients must be re-examined.

Citing Articles

Misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients receiving no local-regional therapy prior to liver transplant: An analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network explant pathology form.

Mehta N, Dodge J, Roberts J, Hirose R, Yao F Clin Transplant. 2017; 31(11).

PMID: 28881064 PMC: 5937711. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13107.

References
1.
Washburn K, Edwards E, Harper A, Freeman R . Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10(7):1643-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03127.x. View

2.
Furlan A, Marin D, Agnello F, Di Martino M, Di Marco V, Lagalla R . Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting at contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row computed tomography or gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a small (≤2 cm), indeterminate nodule: growth rate and optimal interval time for imaging follow-up. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012; 36(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823ed462. View

3.
Samoylova M, Dodge J, Yao F, Roberts J . Time to transplantation as a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2014; 20(8):937-44. PMC: 4394747. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23902. View

4.
Rode A, Bancel B, Douek P, Chevallier M, Vilgrain V, Picaud G . Small nodule detection in cirrhotic livers: evaluation with US, spiral CT, and MRI and correlation with pathologic examination of explanted liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25(3):327-36. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200105000-00001. View

5.
Hameed B, Mehta N, Sapisochin G, Roberts J, Yao F . Alpha-fetoprotein level > 1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. Liver Transpl. 2014; 20(8):945-51. PMC: 4807739. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23904. View