» Articles » PMID: 25366492

Is There Evidence for Potential Harm of Electronic Cigarette Use in Pregnancy?

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Nov 5
PMID 25366492
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and other nicotine containing products is increasing among women of reproductive age. The short- and long-term effects of these products on both mother and fetus are unknown.

Methods: Because e-cigarettes are nicotine delivery systems, we sought to conduct a comprehensive review of the effects of nicotine on the fetus.

Results: In utero nicotine exposure in animal models is associated with adverse effects for the offspring lung, cardiovascular system and brain. In the lung, this included reduced surface area, weight, and volume, as well as emphysema-like lesions. In adulthood, exposed offspring demonstrate elevated blood pressure and increased perivascular adipose tissue. In the brain, exposure alters offspring serotonergic, dopaminergic, and norepinephrine networks, which in turn are associated with behavioral and cognitive impairments. We also review current data on the lack of efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnant women, and highlight different nicotine containing products such as snuff, snus, and hookah.

Conclusion: We conclude that no amount of nicotine is known to be safe during pregnancy, and studies specifically addressing this risk are crucial and an imminent public health issue.

Citing Articles

Acute exposure to electronic cigarette components alters mRNA expression of pre-osteoblasts.

Dabdoub S, Greenlee A, Abboud G, Brengartner L, Zuiker E, Gorr M FASEB J. 2024; 38(17):e70017.

PMID: 39213037 PMC: 11371384. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202302014RRR.


Age, gender and socioeconomic patterns of awareness and usage of e-cigarettes across selected WHO region countries: evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey.

Kundu S, Shaw S, Khan J, Chattopadhyay A, Baptista E, Paswan B BMJ Open. 2023; 13(1):e070419.

PMID: 36657753 PMC: 9853219. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070419.


Attitude and Practice Toward Use of Cigarettes and Electronic Cigarettes Among Pregnant Women: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Yildirim E, Duru S, Sevim T, Topcu F, Gemicioglu B, Ozmen I Turk Thorac J. 2022; 23(6):409-419.

PMID: 36148528 PMC: 9682937. DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2022.22078.


The Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use During Pregnancy and Unfavorable Birth Outcomes.

Galbo A, Izhakoff N, Courington C, Castro G, Lozano J, Ruiz-Pelaez J Cureus. 2022; 14(7):e26748.

PMID: 35967153 PMC: 9365076. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26748.


In utero exposures to mint-flavored JUUL aerosol impair lung development and aggravate house dust mite-induced asthma in adult offspring mice.

Cahill K, Johnson T, Perveen Z, Schexnayder M, Xiao R, Heffernan L Toxicology. 2022; 477:153272.

PMID: 35878681 PMC: 9706914. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153272.


References
1.
Aagaard-Tillery K, Spong C, Thom E, Sibai B, Wendel Jr G, Wenstrom K . Pharmacogenomics of maternal tobacco use: metabolic gene polymorphisms and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115(3):568-577. PMC: 3263385. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d06faf. View

2.
Oncken C, Dornelas E, Greene J, Sankey H, Glasmann A, Feinn R . Nicotine gum for pregnant smokers: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112(4):859-67. PMC: 2630492. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318187e1ec. View

3.
Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, Ventura S, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S . Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008; 56(6):1-103. View

4.
Shihadeh A, Salman R, Jaroudi E, Saliba N, Sepetdjian E, Blank M . Does switching to a tobacco-free waterpipe product reduce toxicant intake? A crossover study comparing CO, NO, PAH, volatile aldehydes, "tar" and nicotine yields. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012; 50(5):1494-8. PMC: 3407543. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.02.041. View

5.
England L, Kim S, Shapiro-Mendoza C, Wilson H, Kendrick J, Satten G . Maternal smokeless tobacco use in Alaska Native women and singleton infant birth size. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 91(1):93-103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01273.x. View