» Articles » PMID: 25361791

'The Kind of Mildly Curious Sort of Science Interested Person Like Me': Science Bloggers' Practices Relating to Audience Recruitment

Overview
Date 2014 Nov 2
PMID 25361791
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With at least 150 million professional and amateur blogs on the Internet, blogging offers a potentially powerful tool for engaging large and diverse audiences with science. This article investigates science blogging practices to uncover key trends, including bloggers' self-perceptions of their role. Interviews with seven of the most popular science bloggers revealed them to be driven by intrinsic personal motivations. Wishing to pursue their love of writing and share their passion for science, they produce content suitable for niche audiences of science enthusiasts, although they do not assume background scientific knowledge. A content analysis of 1000 blog posts and comparison with the most popular blogs on the Internet further confirmed this result and additionally identified key factors that affect science blog popularity, including update frequency, topic diversity and the inclusion of non-text elements (especially images and video).

Citing Articles

Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media.

Martin C, MacDonald B PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0241972.

PMID: 33170855 PMC: 7654796. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241972.


Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists.

Barel-Ben David Y, Garty E, Baram-Tsabari A PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0222250.

PMID: 31914124 PMC: 6948730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222250.


Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018.

MacKenzie L R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(1):180932.

PMID: 30800351 PMC: 6366159. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180932.


The Circulation of Scientific Articles in the Sphere of Web-Based Media: Citation Practices, Communities of Interests and Local Ties.

Lefebvre M, Renard J PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158393.

PMID: 27467573 PMC: 4965155. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158393.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

2.
Wilkins J . The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(8):411-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.004. View

3.
Nisbet M, Scheufele D . What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot. 2011; 96(10):1767-78. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900041. View