Quantifying Direct Effects of Social Determinants of Health on Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
Overview
Pharmacology
Affiliations
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate if self-care is the pathway through which social determinants of health impact diabetes outcomes by analyzing the direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic and psychosocial factors on self-care and glycemic control.
Subjects And Methods: Six hundred fifteen adults were recruited from two primary care clinics in the southeastern United States. A series of confirmatory factor analyses identified the latent factors underlying social status, psychosocial determinants (psychological distress, self-efficacy, and social support), and self-care (diet, exercise, foot care, glucose testing, and medication adherence). Structured equation modeling investigated the relationship among social determinants, self-care and glycemic control.
Results: Latent variables were created for diabetes self-care, psychological distress, self-efficacy, social support, and social status. The final model [χ(2)(275)=450.07, P<0.001, R(2)=99, root mean square error of approximation=0.03, comparative fit index=0.98] showed lower psychological distress (r=-0.13, P=0.012), higher social support (r=0.14, P=0.01), and higher self-efficacy (r=0.47, P<0.001) were significantly related to diabetes self-care. Lower psychological distress (r=0.10, P=0.03), lower social support (r=0.10, P=0.02), and higher self-efficacy (r=-0.37, P<0.001) were significantly related to lower glycemic control. When social determinants of health variables were included in the model, self-care was no longer significantly associated with glycemic control (r=0.01, P=0.83).
Conclusions: This study suggests a direct relationship between psychosocial determinants of health and glycemic control. Although associated with self-care, the relationship between social determinants of health and glycemic control is not mediated by self-care. Development of interventions should take psychosocial factors into account as independent influences on diabetes outcomes, rather than as indirect influences via self-care behavior.
Characteristics and Dosing Patterns of Tirzepatide Users with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.
Mody R, Desai K, Teng C, Reznor G, Stockbower G, Grabner M Diabetes Ther. 2025; 16(2):307-327.
PMID: 39794609 PMC: 11794899. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01684-6.
Magny-Normilus C, Hassan S, Sanders J, Longhurst C, Lee C, Jurgens C Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).
PMID: 36359258 PMC: 9687849. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112735.
White A, Buschur E, Harris C, Pennell M, Soliman A, Wyne K Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022; 15:2323-2334.
PMID: 35958875 PMC: 9359168. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S327158.
Manusov E, Diego V, Sheikh K, Laston S, Blangero J, Williams-Blangero S Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:936052.
PMID: 35845438 PMC: 9283683. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.936052.
Complications in Diabetes Mellitus: Social Determinants and Trends.
Cuddapah G, Chennakesavulu P, Pentapurthy P, Vallakati M, Kongara A, Reddivari P Cureus. 2022; 14(4):e24415.
PMID: 35619856 PMC: 9126423. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24415.