» Articles » PMID: 25355431

Effect of Medicare Dialysis Payment Reform on Use of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Oct 31
PMID 25355431
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) replaced fee-for-service reimbursement for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) with a fixed-sum bundled payment for all dialysis-related care and pay-for-performance incentives to discourage maintaining patients' hematocrits above 36 percent. We examined the impact of the new payment policy on the use of ESAs.

Data Sources: CMS's Renal Information Management System.

Study Design: Regression discontinuity design assessing the use of ESAs by hematocrit level before and after the implementation of the payment policy change.

Data Extraction: Secondary data from 424,163 patients receiving hemodialysis treatment between January 2009 and June 2011.

Principal Findings: The introduction of bundled payments with pay-for-performance initiatives was associated with an immediate and substantial decline in the use of ESAs among patients with hematocrit >36 percent and little change in the use of ESAs among patients with hematocrit ≤36 percent. In the first two quarters of 2011, the use of ESAs during dialysis fell by about 7-9 percentage points among patients with hematocrit levels >36 percent. No statistically significant differences in ESA use were observed at the thresholds of 30 or 33 percent.

Conclusions: CMS's payment reform for dialysis care reduced the use of ESAs in patients who may not benefit from these agents.

Citing Articles

Payment systems for dialysis and their effects: a scoping review.

Emrani Z, Amiresmaili M, Daroudi R, Najafi M, Akbari Sari A BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):45.

PMID: 36650516 PMC: 9847119. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08974-4.


Ferric citrate hydrate is associated with a reduced cost of drugs and a smaller change in red blood cell distribution width.

Ito K, Yokoyama K, Nakayama M, Fukagawa M, Hirakata H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2406.

PMID: 35165297 PMC: 8844010. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06261-0.


Medication Burden and Prescribing Patterns in Patients on Hemodialysis in the USA, 2013-2017.

Paik J, Zhuo M, York C, Tsacogianis T, Kim S, Desai R Am J Nephrol. 2021; 52(12):919-928.

PMID: 34814147 PMC: 8979193. DOI: 10.1159/000520028.


Uptake of evidence by physicians: De-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial.

Vu K, Zhou J, Everhart A, Desai N, Herrin J, Jena A BMC Nephrol. 2021; 22(1):284.

PMID: 34419007 PMC: 8379779. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02491-y.


Temporal Trends in Hemoglobin, Use of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents, and Major Clinical Outcomes in Incident Dialysis Patients in Canada.

Canney M, Birks P, Shao S, Parfrey P, Djurdjev O, Levin A Kidney Int Rep. 2021; 6(4):1130-1140.

PMID: 33912762 PMC: 8071619. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.022.


References
1.
Drueke T, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt K, Macdougall I, Tsakiris D . Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(20):2071-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa062276. View

2.
Swaminathan S, Mor V, Mehrotra R, Trivedi A . Medicare's payment strategy for end-stage renal disease now embraces bundled payment and pay-for-performance to cut costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(9):2051-8. PMC: 3766315. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0368. View

3.
Thamer M, Zhang Y, Kaufman J, Cotter D, Dong F, Hernan M . Dialysis facility ownership and epoetin dosing in patients receiving hemodialysis. JAMA. 2007; 297(15):1667-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.15.1667. View

4.
. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline and Clinical Practice Recommendations for anemia in chronic kidney disease: 2007 update of hemoglobin target. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007; 50(3):471-530. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.06.008. View

5.
Pfeffer M, Burdmann E, Chen C, Cooper M, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt K . A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(21):2019-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907845. View