» Articles » PMID: 25355309

Malunion of Distal Radius Fractures in Children

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Oct 31
PMID 25355309
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Distal forearm fractures in children have excellent remodeling potential. The current literature states that 15° is the maximum acceptable angulation limit, though studies focusing on remodeling capacity above this value are lacking. We present data on the remodeling process in children with distal radius malunions with an angulation of ≥ 15°.

Patients And Methods: Retrospectively, we radiographically evaluated the remodeling in 33 children (aged 3-14 years) with 40 distal radius fractures healed in ≥ 15° angulation in the dorsovolar (DV) plane (n = 32) and/or the radioulnar (RU) plane (n = 8). Malunion angulation at the start and at last follow-up was measured on AP and lateral-view radiographs. Mean follow-up time was 9 (3-29) months.

Results: All fractures showed remodeling. Mean DV malunion angulation was 23° (15-49) and mean RU malunion angulation was 21° (15-33). At follow-up, this had remodeled to mean 8° (-2 to 21) DV and 10° (3-17) RU. Mean remodeling speed (RS) was 2.5° (0.4-7.6) per month. There was a negative correlation between RS and remodeling time (RT) and a positive correlation between RS and malunion angulation. The relationship between RS and RT was exponential. RS was not found to be related to age or sex.

Interpretation: Remodeling speed decreases exponentially over time. Its starting value depends on the amount of angulation of distal radius fractures. This compensates for the increased need for remodeling in severely angulated fractures.

Citing Articles

Metaphyseal distal radius fractures in adolescents: is closed reduction and casting sufficient for most?.

Hancock D, Barrett-Lee J, Abdellatif A, White S, Liu P, Roberts D Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):64.

PMID: 39915302 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04182-y.


Cubitus varus deformity following paediatric supracondylar humeral fracture remodelling predominantly in the sagittal direction: A three-dimensional analysis of eighty-six cases.

Miyake T, Miyamura S, Miki R, Shiode R, Iwahashi T, Kazui A Int Orthop. 2024; 48(8):2091-2099.

PMID: 38727804 PMC: 11246304. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06197-2.


Clinical Follow-Up without Radiographs Is Sufficient after Most Nonoperatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in Children.

Perhomaa M, Stockell M, Pokka T, Lieber J, Niinimaki J, Sinikumpu J Children (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36832469 PMC: 9955157. DOI: 10.3390/children10020339.


Paediatric distal radius fractures: an instructional review for the FRCS examination.

Khan H, Monsell F, Duffy S, Trompeter A, Bridgens A, Gelfer Y Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022; 33(5):2169-2172.

PMID: 36201032 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03409-6.


Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Garcia-Rueda M, Bohorquez-Penaranda A, Gil-Laverde J, Aguilar-Sierra F, Mendoza-Pulido C JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(4):e34576.

PMID: 35436224 PMC: 9052017. DOI: 10.2196/34576.


References
1.
Gerver W, de Bruin R . Growth velocity: a presentation of reference values in Dutch children. Horm Res. 2003; 60(4):181-4. DOI: 10.1159/000073230. View

2.
Ploegmakers J, Verheyen C . Acceptance of angulation in the non-operative treatment of paediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006; 15(6):428-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000210594.81393.fe. View

3.
Gasco J, de Pablos J . Bone remodeling in malunited fractures in children. Is it reliable?. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997; 6(2):126-32. DOI: 10.1097/01202412-199704000-00008. View

4.
Price C, Scott D, Kurzner M, Flynn J . Malunited forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990; 10(6):705-12. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199011000-00001. View

5.
Friberg K . Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. I. The effect of residual angulation on the spatial orientation of the epiphyseal plates. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979; 50(5):537-46. DOI: 10.3109/17453677908989801. View