» Articles » PMID: 25351495

Predictive Distractor Context Facilitates Attentional Selection of High, but Not Intermediate and Low, Salience Targets

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Oct 30
PMID 25351495
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is well established that we can focally attend to a specific region in visual space without shifting our eyes, so as to extract action-relevant sensory information from covertly attended locations. The underlying mechanisms that determine how fast we engage our attentional spotlight in visual-search scenarios, however, remain controversial. One dominant view advocated by perceptual decision-making models holds that the times taken for focal-attentional selection are mediated by an internal template that biases perceptual coding and selection decisions exclusively through target-defining feature coding. This notion directly predicts that search times remain unaffected whether or not participants can anticipate the upcoming distractor context. Here we tested this hypothesis by employing an illusory-figure localization task that required participants to search for an invariant target amongst a variable distractor context, which gradually changed--either randomly or predictably--as a function of distractor-target similarity. We observed a graded decrease in internal focal-attentional selection times--correlated with external behavioral latencies--for distractor contexts of higher relative to lower similarity to the target. Critically, for low but not intermediate and high distractor-target similarity, these context-driven effects were cortically and behaviorally amplified when participants could reliably predict the type of distractors. This interactive pattern demonstrates that search guidance signals can integrate information about distractor, in addition to target, identities to optimize distractor-target competition for focal-attentional selection.

Citing Articles

Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage.

Schroeder S, Aagten-Murphy D, Busch N Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(3):718-733.

PMID: 36917354 PMC: 10066168. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w.


Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.

Kristjansson A Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(1):22-39.

PMID: 35831678 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02125-w.


Contextual cueing in co-active visual search: Joint action allows acquisition of task-irrelevant context.

Zang X, Zinchenko A, Wu J, Zhu X, Fang F, Shi Z Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(4):1114-1129.

PMID: 35437702 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02470-x.


Temporal integration of feature probability distributions.

Hansmann-Roth S, Borsteinsdottir S, Geng J, Kristjansson A Psychol Res. 2022; 86(6):2030-2044.

PMID: 34997327 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01621-3.


Extrafoveal Processing in Categorical Search for Geometric Shapes: General Tendencies and Individual Variations.

Dreneva A, Shvarts A, Chumachenko D, Krichevets A Cogn Sci. 2021; 45(8):e13025.

PMID: 34379345 PMC: 8459262. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13025.


References
1.
Navalpakkam V, Itti L . Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron. 2007; 53(4):605-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018. View

2.
Treue S, Martinez Trujillo J . Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature. 1999; 399(6736):575-9. DOI: 10.1038/21176. View

3.
Tomita H, Ohbayashi M, Nakahara K, Hasegawa I, Miyashita Y . Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval. Nature. 1999; 401(6754):699-703. DOI: 10.1038/44372. View

4.
Tollner T, Muller H, Zehetleitner M . Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 22(7):1554-63. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr231. View

5.
Conci M, Tollner T, Leszczynski M, Muller H . The time-course of global and local attentional guidance in Kanizsa-figure detection. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(9):2456-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.023. View